Effects of anger on dominance-seeking and aggressive behaviors
Introduction
Emotions have important biological functions and their expressions are adaptations that are critical to the survival of some animals (Darwin, 1872; Shariff & Tracy, 2011; Tooby & Cosmides, 2008). Unlike moods, emotional responses predispose the individual to action, producing a cascade of rapid physiological changes and preparing behavioral reaction tendencies, which affect social interactions and nonverbal communication (Ekman & Cordaro, 2011; Izard, 2007; Moors, Ellsworth, Scherer, & Frijda, 2013; Scherer, 2005). Anger is usually a short-lived and intense negative emotion that can be triggered by the frustration of personal goals (Carver & Harmon-Jones, 2009; Ekman & Cordaro, 2011; Frijda, 1986). Although the importance of anger expression for social interactions is well established, the functional and adaptive role of anger on human behavior have only recently begun to be elucidated (e.g., Sell, Cosmides, & Tooby, 2014; Sell, Tooby, & Cosmides, 2009).
Anger is characterized by several behavioral and physiological changes (Cabral, Tavares, & de Almeida, 2016). The main behavioral manifestations of anger are linked to hostility, impulsivity, and aggression (Archer & Webb, 2006; Veenstra, Bushman, & Koole, 2017). Although anger has a negative valence (i.e., is elicited by stimuli perceived as unpleasant), it triggers approach responses to the eliciting stimulus (Carver & Harmon-Jones, 2009; Harmon-Jones & Sigelman, 2001). This emotion correlates with strength (Sell et al., 2009; Sell, Hone, & Pound, 2012; Tibubos, Schnell, & Rohrmann, 2013), sense of control (Lerner & Keltner, 2001), assertiveness (Doyle & Biaggio, 1981), and competitiveness (Adam & Brett, 2015; Archer & Webb, 2006). Physiologically, anger at more intense levels has an effect on the secretion of testosterone (Peterson & Harmon-Jones, 2012; Stanton, Wirth, Waugh, & Schultheiss, 2009). In everyday life, people experience some of the most important consequences of anger in social situations (Deffenbacher, Oetting, Lynch, & Morris, 1996). These effects have been increasingly studied in the context of negotiations, where expression of anger is relatively common (Fabiansson & Denson, 2012). In negotiations, people concede more when they realize that their opponents are feeling angry (Overbeck, Neale, & Govan, 2010; Sinaceur & Tiedens, 2006; van Kleef, De Dreu, & Manstead, 2004). This may be an effect of fear, since anger can induce a complementary response of fear, which can be instilled in the angry person's opponent (Dimberg & Öhman, 1996; van Kleef et al., 2004).
Several studies have found evidence that anger has an effect on dominance, which is an agonistic pattern highly adaptive for many species (Archer, 2009; Holekamp & Strauss, 2016). Individuals expressing anger are perceived as more dominant than those expressing other emotions or in neutral situations (Hareli, Shomrat, & Hess, 2009; Hess, Blairy, & Kleck, 2000; Knutson, 1996). Facial expressions of anger, with the eyebrow frown being its main feature, can be interpreted as threat signals (Hermans, Ramsey, & van Honk, 2008; Öhman, Lundqvist, & Esteves, 2001; Reed, DeScioli, & Pinker, 2014), and such signals play a key role in establishment and maintenance of social hierarchies (Buss, 2008; van Honk, Bos, & Terburg, 2014). In turn, there is a perception that high-status individuals have a greater propensity to feel angry, when compared with lower-ranked individuals (Hess, Adams, & Kleck, 2005; Tiedens, Ellsworth, & Mesquita, 2000). Indeed, mutual effects between anger and dominance have a solid empirical basis; however, most of these studies have focused on the effects of visual cues of facial and body expressions (Cabral et al., 2016), overlooking other possible effects between these variables.
Dominance can be defined as a pattern of social interaction based on control of both the behavior of lower-ranked individuals and valuable resources, and arises as a consequence of asymmetric agonistic encounters (Drews, 1993; Kaufmann, 1983). Dominance is established through fighting ability (i.e., resource holding potential; Parker, 1974), status signals (Maynard Smith & Harper, 1988), or other extrinsic factors (Dugatkin & Dugatkin, 2007; Huntingford & Turner, 1987; van Doorn, Hengeveld, & Weissing, 2003). In primates, dominance seeking is an adaptive behavior that can facilitate reproductive efforts and allow privileged access to available resources (Cowlishaw & Dunbar, 1991; Holekamp & Strauss, 2016; Kaufmann, 1983). Hierarchies regulate access to food, territory, and mates, reducing energy expenditure and injuries resulting from aggressive contests (Holekamp & Strauss, 2016; Kaufmann, 1983).
Several characteristics of anger are equally typical of dominance-seeking behaviors. In humans, dominance can increase assertiveness (Williams & Tiedens, 2015), competitiveness (Mehta, Jones, & Josephs, 2008) and testosterone secretion (Mazur & Booth, 1998; Mehta et al., 2008). Like angry individuals, dominant individuals are more prone to aggression (Johnson, Burk, & Kirkpatrick, 2007), which in turn is another naturally decisive factor in the establishment of dominance hierarchies (Archer, 2009; Holekamp & Strauss, 2016). In addition, dominant behavior also has a complementary effect, leading some observers to follow submissive behavioral patterns (Tiedens & Fragale, 2003), besides having a significant role in negotiations (Anderson & Galinsky, 2006).
These similar patterns for anger and dominance seeking may indicate overlapping adaptive functions between both variables. As for dominance, humans were exposed to similar selective pressures as those that determined intraspecific hostile interactions in other social animals (Archer, 2009; de Almeida, Cabral, & Narvaes, 2015; Huntingford & Turner, 1987; Sell et al., 2012). In fact, it is not logical to assume that such adaptation, which is highly relevant for the fitness and behavior of a wide variety of taxonomic groups, has not significantly impacted the way humans respond to their environments. However, the influence of dominance on human behavior is still underestimated. Perhaps dominance displays (for nonhuman animals) are a natural expression of what we call “anger expressions” for humans.
This possible overlap may be explained by the recalibrational theory of anger that was proposed and empirically corroborated by Sell et al., 2009, Sell et al., 2014. According to Sell (2011), anger is an adaptation to resolve conflicts using a bargaining system that motivates the infliction of costs on opponents in an attempt to have opponents place greater weight on the welfare of the angry individual. That is, anger evolved to orchestrate social bargaining behaviors, resolving conflicts in favor of angry people. However, such conflict resolution mechanisms can be determinant of the establishment and maintenance of dominance hierarchies. Indeed, the recalibrational theory of anger is based on the evolutionary concept of resource-holding potential (Sell, 2006, Sell, 2011), which is a key factor in understanding the agonistic and dominant behaviors – including escalation and asymmetric conflicts – in many animal species (Dugatkin & Dugatkin, 2007; Maynard Smith & Parker, 1976; Parker, 1974). Resource-holding potential is the measure of the fighting ability of a given animal, i.e., its inherent ability to acquire and hold a resource in contests (Maynard Smith & Parker, 1976; Parker, 1974). Differences in resource-holding potential (asymmetries) can lead to dominant-subordinate status (Buss, 2008; Dugatkin & Dugatkin, 2007; Huntingford & Turner, 1987; Maynard Smith & Parker, 1976; Parker, 1974). In this way, anger can help to maintain or improve one's standing in a dominance hierarchy. However, as far as we know, no study has investigated whether anger triggers dominance-seeking behaviors in those who feel it.
Across two experiments, we investigate whether anger induction causes agonistic, dominance-seeking tendencies in men. In Study 1, we manipulated a male-male social interaction to induce anger, testing the following predictions: 1) anger increases status-seeking tendencies; 2) anger increases aggressive behavior; and, 3) steroid hormone responses moderate the effects of anger on status-seeking tendencies. In Study 2, we used film clips to induce anger, other negative emotions (fear and sadness) and a neutral state (control). We predicted that anger increases self-reported typical dominance behaviors (e.g., approach-retreat patterns, leadership motivation, and eye contact).
Section snippets
Study 1
In Study 1, we examined the effects of anger induction on measures of status-seeking and aggressive behaviors. After a hostile social interaction (an offensive feedback in a mock debate), we assessed the choices of hierarchical positions, aggression, and hormone levels. In addition to testosterone, we measured cortisol levels, which can attenuate the dominance drive (Mehta & Prasad, 2015). Also, we used electromyography (EMG) to measure corrugator activity during the experiment in order to
Experimental manipulation check
We checked the experimental manipulation using generalized linear models with Gaussian distribution and identity link function to compare EMG records between groups throughout the experiment. There were significant differences between groups in manipulation (Wald(1) = 3.345, p = 0.034) and post-manipulation (Wald(1) = 4.344, p = 0.019) EMG measures (Fig. 1). Moreover, results remained significant for EMG responses (ΔEMG; baseline-to-target period changes): manipulation (Wald(1) = 6.055, p
Study 2
Approach-retreat interactions are key factors for the establishment of dominance hierarchies in many species (Rowell, 1974). Several typical submissive behaviors reflect avoidance inclinations and dominance motives reflect appetitive inclinations (Terburg & van Honk, 2013; Weick, McCall, & Blascovich, 2017). Anger and fear have also increasingly been understood as causes of approach-avoidance inclinations (Terburg & van Honk, 2013). However, it is not completely clear how these contrasting
Results and discussion of study 2
Comparing the groups for dominance tendency questions, descriptive results showed that the anger group consistently had higher levels of dominance in all items assessed (Table 3). Indeed, there were significant differences between groups for four out of five dominance questions: item 25 on “leadership” (Wald(3) = 8.608, p = 0.035; two-tailed); item 26 on “self-confidence” (Wald(3) = 9.263, p = 0.013; two-tailed); item 27 on “power” (Wald(3) = 1.032, p = 0.794; two-tailed); item 28 on
General discussion
The results of the experiments confirmed the hypothesis that anger has significant effects on dominance-seeking and agonistic behaviors in men. In the first experiment, anger-induced participants chose higher hierarchical positions for themselves, when EMG response was controlled, as compared with the control group. The anger group also demonstrated higher aggression levels in all rounds of the aggression task. Certainly, anger triggered agonistic behavior patterns in men, indicating that
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Elton Pinto Colares and Dr. Vera Torres das Neves for technical assistance. This research was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico [CNPq grant number 141209/2016-0].
Data availability
The data associated with this research are available at https://osf.io/65jfn.
References (81)
- et al.
Context matters: The social effects of anger in cooperative, balanced, and competitive negotiation situations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(2015) The nature of human aggression
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
(2009)- et al.
Reciprocal effects between dominance and anger: A systematic review
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
(2016) Neural basis of social status hierarchy across species
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
(2010)- et al.
Dominance rank and mating success in male primates
Animal Behaviour
(1991) - et al.
Behavioural, hormonal and neurobiological mechanisms of aggressive behaviour in human and nonhuman primates
Physiology & Behavior
(2015) - et al.
The expression of anger and its consequences
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1996) - et al.
Exogenous testosterone enhances responsiveness to social threat in the neural circuitry of social aggression in humans
Biological Psychiatry
(2008) - et al.
Coalescence of dominance motivation and responses to facial anger in resting-state and event-related electrophysiology
NeuroImage
(2013) - et al.
Aggression and dominance: An interdisciplinary overview
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
(2016)
Dominance and prestige as differential predictors of aggression and testosterone levels in men
Evolution and Human Behavior
Carver and Whites' BIS/FFFS/BAS scales and domains and facets of the five factor model of personality
Personality and Individual Differences
The dual-hormone hypothesis: A brief review and future research agenda
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
I feel, therefore you act: Intrapersonal and interpersonal effects of emotion on negotiation as a function of social power
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Assessment strategy and the evolution of animal conflicts
Journal of Theoretical Biology
The concept of social dominance
Behavioral Biology
The recalibrational theory and violent anger
Aggression and Violent Behavior
The human anger face evolved to enhance cues of strength
Evolution and Human Behavior
Bargaining power and adolescent aggression: The role of fighting ability, coalitional strength, and mate value
Evolution and Human Behavior
The grammar of anger: Mapping the computational architecture of a recalibrational emotion
Cognition
Get mad and get more than even: When and why anger expression is effective in negotiations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Endogenous testosterone levels are associated with amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex responses to anger faces in men but not women
Biological Psychology
Power, optimism, and risk-taking
European Journal of Social Psychology
The relation between scores on the Buss–Perry Aggression Questionnaire and aggressive acts, impulsiveness, competitiveness, dominance, and sexual jealousy
Aggressive Behavior
Appetitive motivation predicts the neural response to facial signals of aggression
The Journal of Neuroscience
Considering anger from a cognitive neuroscience perspective
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science
Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind
Eliciting negative affects using film clips and real-life methods
Psychological Reports
Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications
Psychological Bulletin
Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
The expression of the emotions in man and animals. The expression of the emotions in man and animals
Behavioral inhibition system (BIS) strength and trait dominance are associated with affective response and perspective taking when viewing dyadic interactions
International Journal of Neuroscience
Behold the wrath: Psychophysiological responses to facial stimuli
Motivation and Emotion
Expression of anger as a function of assertiveness and sex
Journal of Clinical Psychology
The concept and definition of dominance in animal behaviour
Behaviour
Extrinsic effects, estimating opponents' RHP, and the structure of dominance hierarchies
Biology Letters
What is meant by calling emotions basic
Emotion Review
The effects of intrapersonal anger and its regulation in economic bargaining
PLoS One
The emotions
Emotion elicitation using films
Cognition & Emotion
Cited by (16)
AI and human broadcasters: Relative impact on consumer engagement in live streaming commerce
2023, Electronic Commerce Research and ApplicationsMicroaggressions Are a Form of Aggression
2021, Behavior TherapyCitation Excerpt :Notably, Wyckoff (2016) found that anger and not negative affect predicts the desire to aggress, which is in line with current findings. Additionally, prior research has found that anger increases dominance-seeking and antagonistic behaviors (Cabral & de Almeida, 2019). In this study, aggressive anger was more strongly correlated to all four categories of microaggressions (negative/hostile attitudes, colorblindness, objectifying, and avoidance), more so than negative affect, although aggressive hostility showed the strongest correlations across microaggression categories.
Dominance, prestige, and the role of leveling in human social hierarchy and equality
2020, Current Opinion in PsychologyCitation Excerpt :By contrast, dominants are disinclined towards behaving prosocially, but instead exhibit antagonism, aggression, and hubris, and the prioritization of self-interest over collective good [35–40]. Ethologically, dominance (unlike prestige) is associated with vocal, facial, and postural patterns that signal threat and formidability, such as a deeper pitch profile, signals of anger, facial masculinity, and elaborate and expansive pride displays [8•,41–46]. These two forms of rank in humans, and their underlying psychological and behavioral differences, have also long been noted in anthropological ethnographies across a range of simpler societies [12•,15,47] (reviewed in Ref. [8•]).
A place for emotions in behavior systems research
2019, Behavioural ProcessesCitation Excerpt :Consider, overeating, junk food, drug addictions or sadomasochistic sex. Recent experiments in humans show the role of anger on both appetitive dominance seeking and aggression (Cabral and de Almeida, 2019). The relatively discrete emotions position of Panksepp and others has been criticized on several grounds and alternative dimensional, valence, cognitive appraisal, and other schemes advanced (e.g., Moors, 2009; Barrett, 2017b).
Experimentally manipulated anger activates implicit cognitions about social hierarchy
2024, Cognition and Emotion