Original article
European hair and eye color: A case of frequency-dependent sexual selection?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.07.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Human hair and eye color is unusually diverse in northern and eastern Europe. The many alleles involved (at least seven for hair color) and their independent origin over a short span of evolutionary time indicate some kind of selection. Sexual selection is particularly indicated because it is known to favor color traits and color polymorphisms. In addition, hair and eye color is most diverse in what used to be, when first peopled by hunter-gatherers, a unique ecozone of low-latitude continental tundra. This type of environment skews the operational sex ratio (OSR) of hunter-gatherers toward a male shortage in two ways: (1) men have to hunt highly mobile and spatially concentrated herbivores over longer distances, with no alternate food sources in case of failure, the result being more deaths among young men; (2) women have fewer opportunities for food gathering and thus require more male provisioning, the result being less polygyny. These two factors combine to leave more women than men unmated at any one time. Such an OSR imbalance would have increased the pressures of sexual selection on early European women, one possible outcome being an unusual complex of color traits: hair- and eye-color diversity and, possibly, extreme skin depigmentation.

Introduction

Human hair and eye color is unusually diverse in a geographic area centered on the East Baltic and covering northern and eastern Europe (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). Within this area, eyes are not only brown but also blue, gray, hazel, or green, while hair is not only black but also brown, flaxen, golden, or red (Beals & Hoijer, 1965, pp. 212–214). As one moves outward from this area, color diversity declines markedly with eyes becoming uniformly brown and hair uniformly black.

Is this diversity due to chance? In particular, could it reflect founder effects during the repeopling of glaciated Europe 15,000 to 10,000 years ago? When a founder group breaks off from its parent population, such “sampling” may indeed increase the frequency of a variant hair- or eye-color allele. It is less probable that two alleles of the same gene would become more frequent, and this probability would decline exponentially with each additional allele. Yet the hair-color gene, MC1R, has at least seven phenotypically distinct alleles that exist only in Europe (Box et al., 1997, Harding et al., 2000, Rana et al., 1999). Furthermore, eye-color diversity results from another set of alleles at a locus that is at best weakly linked to hair color (Eiberg & Mohr, 1987).

Is this diversity due to relaxation of selection and a resulting accumulation of variant alleles? Harding et al. (2000) have investigated this evolutionary scenario and found that the time to the most recent common ancestral hair color would be about a million years, with the redhead alleles alone being approximately 80,000 years old. Templeton (2002) has come to a similar conclusion: If the cause were relaxation of selection, the current level of hair-color diversity would have taken 850,000 years to develop. Yet modern humans have been in Europe for approximately 35,000 years.

Is this diversity due to admixture with older European populations, notably the Neanderthals? Recently, human mtDNA has been retrieved from skeletal material on both sides of the transition from Neanderthals to modern humans: No genetic continuity is discernible between the late Neanderthals and the early modern Europeans (Caramelli et al., 2003). In addition, the mtDNA and dental traits of Neanderthals are no more similar to those of present-day Europeans than they are to those of any other modern human population (Krings et al., 1999, Ovchinnikov et al., 2000, Tyrrell & Chamberlain, 1998). Neanderthal admixture seems to have been minor, if not negligible, and could hardly account for the high proportion of Europeans who deviate from the species norm of black hair and brown eyes.

Is this diversity due, then, to some selective force, either natural or sexual selection? The first kind of selection is unlikely. As a rule, highly visible color traits are not adaptations to the natural environment, which typically favors an unobtrusive, cryptic coloration as a means to evade predators. It has been suggested that a lighter colored iris may offer more visual acuity in dim light, such as in the misty maritime environments of northwestern Europe (Short, 1975). Eye color, however, is polymorphic over a much larger area of Europe, most of which is typically continental in climate. It is also unclear why selection for visual acuity would have favored more variability in eye color as opposed to a simple reduction in eye pigment.

The alternative, sexual selection, has already been advanced to explain Europe's hair- and eye-color diversity (Cavalli-Sforza et al., 1994, p. 266). This kind of selection is known to favor colorful traits, but there is little consensus on the reasons why. It may be that bright colors stimulate sexual attraction in the brain through (1) mate-assessment algorithms that interpret pigment production as a sign of health and, hence, mate quality; (2) sex-recognition algorithms that pick out sex-specific color stimuli and respond open-endedly with stronger responses to more intense colors; and (3) general monitoring algorithms that respond to highly visible stimuli and indirectly alert other systems, including those related to sexual attraction (Farr, 1980, Hamilton & Zuk, 1982, Kirkpatrick, 1987, Manning, 1979, pp. 66–75). The opposite sex may exploit all three algorithm types by intensifying its color stimuli until functional constraints intervene or until the cost of easier detection by predators exceeds the benefit of stronger sexual attraction (Endler, 1980, Endler, 1991).

Under certain conditions, sexual selection may also diversify color traits within a single population. When an individual is faced with potential mates of equal value, it will tend to select the one that “stands out from the crowd,” that is, that has the rarest color morph. The selection is frequency-dependent, declining in strength as the rare morph becomes more common and tending toward an equilibrium that maximizes color diversity. This rare-color advantage has been studied mainly in fruit flies and guppies but has also been reported in a parasitic wasp, in red flour beetles, in ladybugs, and in leafroller moths (Anderson, 1969, Brooks, 2002, Farr, 1980, Grant et al., 1974, Hughes et al., 1999, Muggleton, 1979, Simchuk, 2001, Sinnock, 1970). There are also a number of bird species that exhibit color polymorphisms for which the mode of selection remains unclear (Lank, 2002). Whatever the cause, color polymorphisms are relatively uncommon. They are often hindered by two evolutionary constraints: (1) high predation pressure, this being a constraint on color traits in general and (2) the presence of related species within the same geographic range, apparently because too much intraspecific variability interferes with species recognition and leads to hybridization (Endler, 1980).

Many evolutionary biologists dislike the concept of rare-color advantage. There is no gain in fitness from sexual attraction to unusual colors; therefore natural selection should eliminate such nonadaptive behavior. Yet it is difficult to see how, just as it is difficult to see how we can counter the many subterfuges that advertisers use to attract our notice. There are good adaptive reasons for paying attention when an eye-catching object enters our field of view, and it is impossible to disable this response in advance for sexual attraction, given that the nature of the object (animate/inanimate, conspecific/nonconspecific, male/female) is determined at a later stage of mental processing. At that stage, the increased attention could be reversed or given a negative meaning. But there would be a cost: not only in additional processing time but also in overcorrection and undercorrection–like a spam-filter that fails to screen out all unwanted e-mails while blocking some legitimate ones. The cost may be justified if attraction to rare-color morphs leads to hybridization or if the color itself is somehow maladaptive. Otherwise, the benefit will not justify the cost.

Rare-color advantage has been reported in humans. Thelen (1983) presented three series of slides showing blonde and brunette females and asked male participants to select the one from each series that they would most prefer to marry. The first series showed 6 brunettes, the second 1 brunette and 5 blondes, and the third 1 brunette and 11 blondes. For the same brunette, preference increased significantly from the first to the third series, that is, in proportion to the rarity of her hair color. The same effect was observed, albeit to a lesser extent, when the study was repeated with male photos and female participants. These findings have some support from other studies. Schweder (1994) found that women tended to change their hair color and hair form to a type that was less common in the general population. Riedl (1990) found that men tended to prefer female faces that diverge from the norm. Finally, Ellis (1928, pp. 182–183) noted less preference for blonde women in England than in France, which he ascribed to the higher prevalence of blondness among the English.

Rare-color advantage may have caused hair and eye color to diversify in ancestral humans, there being neither of the evolutionary constraints mentioned above, that is, high predation pressure or likelihood of hybridization. Outside Africa, there were only two potential predators: wolves and bears, the latter being uncommon and the former only an occasional threat to recent hunter-gatherers (Hoffecker, 2002, pp. 238, 240). Hybridization was just as nonproblematic. All other Homo populations had been reduced to extinction or relic status by 30,000 BP.

It is less clear, though, why hair and eye color diversified in Europe and not elsewhere. Rare-color advantage is a special case of sexual selection, and the intensity of sexual selection normally varies with the operational sex ratio (OSR; the ratio of unmated males to unmated females). The usual pattern is too many males competing for too few females (pregnancy and early infant care exclude some females from mating at any one time). But why would there have been more competition for women in northern and eastern Europe? If anything, there should have been more in sub-Saharan Africa or Papua New Guinea, where a high incidence of polygyny leaves fewer women unmated.

I will argue here that the usual pattern of too many males and too few females was reversed among ancestral Europeans, specifically among the highly mobile groups that once inhabited the continental tundra of ice-age Europe. This environment exposed men to a higher risk of hunting mortality while limiting their ability to provide for more than one wife. With fewer men altogether and even fewer polygynous ones, women had to compete for a limited supply of potential husbands. There was thus sexual selection, but it acted primarily on women—not on men.

Section snippets

The Eurasian tundra belt: low-latitude west and high-latitude east

As modern humans spread out of Africa during the Upper Paleolithic, they entered new environments, including one that no longer exists. Loess-steppe covered the plains of northern and eastern Europe during successive ice ages and interglacials until 10,000 years ago (Fig. 3). Quite unlike today's northern barrens, it combined Arctic tundra with fertile loess soil and low latitudes, the Eurasian tundra belt having been pushed far to the south by the Scandinavian icecap. Long intense sunlight

Less food gathering=increased female dependence on male provisioning

In adapting to Arctic tundra, modern humans had to change their sexual division of labor, which normally allocated food gathering to women and hunting to men. Women now processed meat provided by men and did tasks unrelated to food procurement, such as garment making and shelter building. Men procured almost all of the food (Hoffecker, 2002, p. 8).

We can see this task reallocation by comparing recent hunter-gatherers from the Tropics to the Arctic. Near the equator, women procure about half of

Peopling of the Eurasian tundra belt

Modern humans penetrated the Eurasian tundra belt no earlier than 35,000 years ago, at first in its most southerly and resource-rich portion—southwestern France (Mellars, 1985). This ‘beachhead’ was dissected by valleys that offered wild fruits, grains, tubers, salmon, and non-Arctic game, as well as migrating reindeer in the fall and winter (Blades, 1999a, Blades, 1999b, Mellars, 1985). The reindeer may have drawn humans out of the sheltered valleys, briefly at first, and then for longer

Diversification of European hair color

The MC1R gene determines hair color by controlling the production of eumelanin (brown and black pigments) and pheomelanin (red and yellow pigments). It is unusually polymorphic in humans, both in its high number of alleles and in its high ratio of nonsynonymous (phenotypically distinct) to synonymous (phenotypically identical) alleles (Box et al., 1997, Flanagan et al., 2000, Harding et al., 2000, Rana et al., 1999, Rees, 2000). Whereas most genes have more synonymous alleles than nonsynonymous

Discussion

One might object that sexual selection could not have diversified European hair and eye color because there is no sexual dimorphism in these traits. Had women been selected for a diversity of hair and eye colors, they would now be more diverse in this respect than men are. It should be noted, however, that both hair and eye colors are, at best, weakly sex-linked; hence, selection acting on women should have affected men and women equally until sex-linked alleles had arisen through chance

Acknowledgments

I wish to thank Dr. John Thomas Manning, who independently came to similar conclusions as I did, despite his approaching the question from a different academic perspective and drawing on a different body of evidence. This ‘repeatability of conclusions’ is further support for the arguments presented here.

References (116)

  • P.A. Mellars

    The ecological basis of social complexity in the Upper Paleolithic of Southwestern France

  • M.P. Richards et al.

    Gough's cave and sun hole cave human stable isotope values indicate a high animal protein diet in the British Upper Paleolithic

    Journal of Archaeological Science

    (2000)
  • F.R. Santos et al.

    The Central Siberian origin for Native American Y chromosomes

    American Journal of Human Genetics

    (1999)
  • R. Scozzari et al.

    Differential structuring of human populations for homologous X and Y microsatellite loci

    American Journal of Human Genetics

    (1997)
  • H. Adlercreutz et al.

    Estrogen metabolism and excretion in Oriental and Caucasian Women

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute

    (1994)
  • V.P. Alexeyev et al.

    Skeletal remains of infants from a burial on the Mal'ta Upper Paleolithic site

    Homo

    (1994)
  • W.W. Anderson

    Polymorphism resulting from the mating advantage of rare male genotypes

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (1969)
  • K. Aoki

    Sexual selection as a cause of human skin colour variation: Darwin's hypothesis revisited

    Annals of Human Biology

    (2002)
  • J.A.L. Armour et al.

    Minisatellite diversity supports a recent African origin for modern humans

    Nature Genetics

    (1996)
  • A. Balikci

    Female infanticide on the Arctic coast

    Man

    (1967)
  • R.L. Beals et al.

    An introduction to anthropology

    (1965)
  • S.R. Binford

    A structural comparison of disposal of the dead in the Mousterian and the Upper Paleolithic

    Southwestern Journal of Anthropology

    (1968)
  • K. Birket-Smith

    The Caribou Eskimos. Material and social life and their cultural position

  • B.S. Blades

    Aurignacian settlement patterns in the Vézère valley

    Current Anthropology

    (1999)
  • N.F. Box et al.

    Characterization of melanocyte stimulating hormone receptor variant alleles in twins with red hair

    Human Molecular Genetics

    (1997)
  • C.L. Brace

    A nonracial approach towards the understanding of human diversity

  • R. Brooks

    Variation in female mate choice within guppy populations: Population divergence, multiple ornaments and the maintenance of polymorphism

    Genetica

    (2002)
  • K.W. Butzer

    Environment and archaeology

    (1964)
  • D. Caramelli et al.

    Evidence for a genetic discontinuity between Neanderthals and 24,000-year-old anatomically modern Europeans

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2003)
  • L.L. Cavalli-Sforza et al.

    The history and geography of human genes

    (1994)
  • S.C. Choi et al.

    Statistical study of the multivariate structure and race–sex differences of American White and Negro fetal skeletons

    American Journal of Physical Anthropology

    (1970)
  • A.L. Coker et al.

    Re: Ethnic differences in estrogen metabolism in healthy women

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute

    (1997)
  • M.H. Crawford et al.

    Genetic structure of the indigenous populations of Siberia

    American Journal of Physical Anthropology

    (1997)
  • A.A. Dahlberg et al.

    The dentition of the Magdalenian female from Cap Blanc, France

    Man

    (1961)
  • D.B. Dickson

    The dawn of belief. Religion in the upper Paleolithic of Southwestern Europe

    (1990)
  • I. Dupanloup et al.

    A recent shift from polygyny to monogamy in humans is suggested by the analysis of worldwide Y-chromosome diversity

    Journal of Molecular Evolution

    (2003)
  • E.A. Edwards et al.

    The pigments and color of living human skin

    American Journal of Anatomy

    (1939)
  • H. Eiberg et al.

    Major genes of eye color and hair color linked to LU and SE

    Clinical Genetics

    (1987)
  • H. Ellis

    Studies in the psychology of sex

    (1928)
  • J.A. Endler

    Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata

    Evolution

    (1980)
  • J.A. Farr

    Social behavior patterns as determinants of reproductive success in the guppy Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae)

    Behaviour

    (1980)
  • S. Feinman et al.

    Sex differences in physical attractiveness preferences

    Journal of Social Psychology

    (1978)
  • N. Flanagan et al.

    Pleiotropic effects of the melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1R) gene on human pigmentation

    Human Molecular Genetics

    (2000)
  • M.D. Fortescue

    Language relations across Bering strait. Reappraising the archaeological and linguistic evidence

    (1998)
  • P. Frost

    Human skin color: A possible relationship between its sexual dimorphism and its social perception

    Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

    (1988)
  • P. Frost

    Geographic distribution of human skin colour: A selective compromise between natural selection and sexual selection?

    Human Evolution

    (1994)
  • P. Frost

    Preference for darker faces in photographs at different phases of the menstrual cycle: Preliminary assessment of evidence for a hormonal relationship

    Perceptual and Motor Skills

    (1994)
  • P. Frost

    Fair women, dark men. The forgotten roots of color prejudice

    (2005)
  • T. Goebel

    Pleistocene human colonization of Siberia and peopling of the Americas: An ecological approach

    Evolutionary Anthropology

    (1999)
  • B. Grant et al.

    Frequency-dependent mate selection in Mormoniella vitripennis

    Evolution

    (1974)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text