Elsevier

Ethology and Sociobiology

Volume 16, Issue 5, September 1995, Pages 395-424
Ethology and Sociobiology

Original article
The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology

https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(95)00068-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Psychological evidence suggests that sex differences in morphology have been modified by sexual selection so as to attract mates (intersexual selection) or intimidate rivals (intrasexual selection). Women compete with each other for high quality husbands by advertising reproductive value in terms of the distribution of fat reserves and by exaggerating morphological indicators of youthfulness such as a small nose and small feet and pale, hairless skin. Men's physical appearance tends to communicate social dominance, which has the combined effects of intimidating reproductive rivals and attracting mates. In addition to their attractiveness and intimidatory effects, human secondary sexual characters also provide cues to hormonal status and phenotypic quality consistent with the good genes model of sexual selection (which includes parasite resistance). Low waist-hip ratio is sexually attractive in women and indicates a high estrogen/testosterone ratio (which favors reproductive function). Facial attractiveness provides honest cues to health and mate value. The permanently enlarged female breast appears to have evolved under the influence of both the good genes and the runaway selection mechanisms. The male beard is not obviously related to phenotypic quality and may have evolved through a process of runaway intersexual selection.

References (100)

  • J.E. Scheib

    Sperm donor selection and the psychology of female mate choice

    Ethology and Sociobiology

    (1994)
  • P.J. Watson et al.

    Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection

    Tree

    (1994)
  • A. Zahavi

    Mate selection: a selection for a handicap

    Journal of Theoretical Biology

    (1975)
  • R.D. Alexander et al.

    Sexual dimorphisms and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates, and humans

  • M.D. Alicke et al.

    Judgments of physical attractiveness: the role of faces and bodies

    Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

    (1986)
  • T.R. Alley et al.

    Average faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average

    Psychological Science

    (1991)
  • A.J. Bateman

    Intrasexual selection

    Drosophila. Heredity

    (1948)
  • S. Beck et al.

    Variables related to women's somatic preferences of the male and female body

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1976)
  • D.S. Berry et al.

    The impact of age-related changes on social perception

  • L. Betzig

    Redistribution: equity or exploitation

  • P. Bjorntop

    Adipose tissue distribution and function

    International Journal of Obesity

    (1991)
  • S.S. Brehm

    Intimate Relationships

    (1985)
  • M. Burd

    Sexual selection and human evolution: all or none adaptation?

    American Anthropologist

    (1986)
  • D.M. Buss

    Sex differences in human mate selection criteria: an evolutionary perspective

  • D.M. Buss

    Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (1989)
  • D.M. Buss et al.

    Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating

    Psychological Review

    (1993)
  • D.M. Buss et al.

    The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating

    (1994)
  • J.G.H. Cant

    Hypothesis for the evolution of human breasts and buttocks

    American Naturalist

    (1981)
  • C.S. Coon

    The Living Races of Man

    (1965)
  • L. Cosmides et al.

    From evolution to behavior: evolutionary psychology as the missing link

  • J.H. Crook

    Sexual selection, dimorphism, and social organization in the primates

  • H. Cronin

    The Ant and the Peacock: Altruism and Sexual Selection from Darwin to Today

    (1991)
  • J.F. Cross et al.

    Age, sex, race, and the perception of facial beauty

    Developmental Psychology

    (1971)
  • M.R. Cunningham

    Measuring the physical in physical attractivess: quasi-experiments in the sociobiology of female facial beauty

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • M.R. Cunningham et al.

    What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1990)
  • M. Daly et al.

    Sex, Evolution, and Behavior

    (1983)
  • C. Darwin

    The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex

    (1871)
  • R. Dawkins

    The Selfish Gene

    (1976)
  • G.H. Elder

    Appearance and education in marriage mobility

    American Sociological Review

    (1969)
  • A.E. Fallon et al.

    Sex differences in perceptions of body shape

    Journal of Abnormal Psychology

    (1985)
  • S. Feinman et al.

    Females' responses to males' beardedness

    Perceptual and Motor Skills

    (1977)
  • R.A. Fisher

    The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection

    (1930)
  • C.S. Ford et al.

    Patterns of Sexual Behavior

    (1951)
  • P. Frost

    Human skin color: a possible relationship between its sexual dimorphism and its social perception

    Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

    (1988)
  • S.W. Gangestad

    Sexual selection and physical attractiveness: implications for mating dynamics

    Human Nature

    (1993)
  • J.S. Gillis et al.

    The male-taller norm in mate selection

    Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

    (1980)
  • A.G. Gitter et al.

    Factors affecting perceived attractiveness of male physiques by American and Israeli students

    The Journal of Social Psychology

    (1982)
  • A.G. Gitter et al.

    Perceptions of female physique characteristics by American and Israeli students

    The Journal of Social Psychology

    (1983)
  • J. Gould et al.

    Sexual Selection

    (1989)
  • K. Grammer

    Human courtship behaviour: biological basis and cognitive processing

  • Cited by (287)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text