Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 31, Issue 6 , Pages 394-399, November 2010

Fertility and race perception predict voter preference for Barack Obama

  • Carlos David Navarrete

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Melissa M. McDonald

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
  • ,
  • Michael L. Mott

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
  • ,
  • Joseph Cesario

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
  • ,
  • Robert Sapolsky

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
    • Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Received 7 October 2009; accepted 5 May 2010. published online 23 July 2010.

Abstract 

Research shows that women more positively evaluate targets evincing cues of high male genetic quality as a function of fertility across the menstrual cycle. Recently, a link between fertility and anti-black race bias has also been documented, an effect that is argued to serve a sexual coercion avoidance function. Here we demonstrate that both effects can be operative toward the same male target depending on inter-individual differences in race perception of the target. Across two studies, we found that the intention to vote for Barack Obama in the months preceding the 2008 election increased as a function of conception risk across the menstrual cycle. In the second study, we found that the effect is greatest among women who perceived him as more white than black, whereas the opposite was true among women who perceived him as mostly black. Our findings tie together separate conceptual research threads on positive and negative evaluations of men by women across the menstrual cycle — integrating them to shed light on women's voting preferences.

Keywords: Conception risk, Menstrual cycle, Sexual coercion avoidance, Race bias, Discrimination, Political psychology

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This material is based in part on support from the National Science Foundation (Grant No. NSF-BCS-0847237).

PII: S1090-5138(10)00049-8

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.05.002

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 31, Issue 6 , Pages 394-399, November 2010