Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 48-58, January 2010

Genetic dissimilarity, genetic diversity, and mate preferences in humans

  • Hanne. C. Lie

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
    • Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. School of Psychology (M304), University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia. Tel.: +61 8 6488 3573; fax: +61 8 6488 1006.
  • ,
  • Leigh W. Simmons

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
  • ,
  • Gillian Rhodes

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia

Received 2 April 2009; accepted 5 July 2009. published online 26 October 2009.

Abstract 

It is clear that genes at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) are involved in mate preferences in a range of species, including humans. However, many questions remain regarding the MHC's exact influence on mate preference in humans. Some research suggests that genetic dissimilarity and individual genetic diversity (heterozygosity) at the MHC influence mate preferences, but the evidence is often inconsistent across studies. In addition, it is not known whether apparent preferences for MHC dissimilarity are specific to the MHC or reflect a more general preference for genome-wide dissimilarity, and whether MHC-related preferences are dependent on the context of mate choice (e.g., when choosing a short-term and long-term partner). Here, we investigated whether preferences for genetic dissimilarity are specific to the MHC and also whether preferences for genetic dissimilarity and diversity are context dependent. Genetic dissimilarity (number of alleles shared) influenced male, but not female, partner preferences, with males showing a preference for the faces of MHC-dissimilar females in both mating contexts. Genetic diversity [heterozygosity (H) and standardized mean (d2)] influenced both male and female preferences, regardless of mating context. Females preferred males with greater diversity at MHC loci (H) and males preferred females with greater diversity at non-MHC loci (d2) in both contexts. Importantly, these findings provide further support for a special role of the MHC in human sexual selection and suggest that male and female mate preferences may work together to potentially enhance both male and female reproductive success by increasing genetic diversity in offspring.

Keywords: MHC, Mate preferences, Genetic diversity, Genetic similarity, Disassortative mate preferences, Facial attractiveness

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1090-5138(09)00066-X

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.07.001

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 48-58, January 2010