Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 80-86, March 2010

Not only states but traits — Humans can identify permanent altruistic dispositions in 20 s

  • Detlef Fetchenhauer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Economic and Social Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    • Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Ton Groothuis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Behavioral Biology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • ,
  • Julia Pradel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Economic and Social Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Received 17 September 2008; accepted 22 June 2009. published online 09 September 2009.

Abstract 

Humans behave altruistically in one-shot interactions under total anonymity. In search of explanations for such behavior, it has been argued that at least some individuals have a general tendency to behave altruistically independent of profitability. In fact, a stable altruistic trait would be adaptive if it were recognizable. Then, altruists could choose each other in order to retain benefits through mutual cooperation. Previous research has shown that individuals can predict the degree of altruistic behavior of strangers by reading signs of emotions evoked in significant social decisions. However, the identification of benevolent emotional states is no guarantee of the existence of permanent altruistic traits, though permanent traits are the preferable criterion for selection of good interaction partners. In this study, we tested whether individuals are able to identify altruistic traits. Judges watched 20-s silent video clips of unacquainted target persons and were asked to estimate the behavior of these target persons in a money-sharing task. As the videotapes of the target persons had been recorded in a setting unrelated to altruistic behavior, the judges could not base their estimates on situational cues related to the money-sharing task but instead had to draw on stable signals of altruism. Estimates were significantly better than chance, indicating that individuals can identify permanent altruistic traits in others. As this mechanism raises opportunities for selective interactions between altruists, our findings are discussed with respect to their relevance for explaining the evolution of altruism through assortment.

PsycInfo classification: 2360 Motivation and emotion, 3040 Social perception and cognition.

Keywords: Altruism, Assortment, Commitment model, Evolution, Game theory, Dictator game, Person perception, Thin slices

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1090-5138(09)00062-2

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.009

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 31, Issue 2 , Pages 80-86, March 2010