Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 22-28, January 2010

Commitment bias: mistaken partner selection or ancient wisdom?

Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology, University of Groningen, The Netherlands

Received 30 July 2008; accepted 18 June 2009. published online 10 September 2009.

Abstract 

Evidence across the social and behavioral sciences points to psychological mechanisms that facilitate the formation and maintenance of interpersonal commitment. In addition, evolutionary simulation studies suggest that a tendency for increased, seemingly irrational commitment is an important trait of successful exchange strategies. However, empirical research that tests corresponding psychological mechanisms is still largely lacking. Here an experimental test is proposed for one such mechanism, termed the commitment bias, which is hypothesized to increase people's commitment to existing partners beyond instrumental reasons. To exclude one alternative explanation, the commitment bias is distinguished from uncertainty reduction. Results from a cross-culturally replicated laboratory experiment (USA, China, and the Netherlands) provide support for the argument but also point to the importance of culture as an alternative or mediating factor.

Keywords: Commitment, Exchange, Interpersonal relationships, Uncertainty, Cross-cultural

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1090-5138(09)00059-2

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.006

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 31, Issue 1 , Pages 22-28, January 2010