Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 30, Issue 6 , Pages 417-428, November 2009

Patterns of eye movements when male and female observers judge female attractiveness, body fat and waist-to-hip ratio

  • Piers L. Cornelissen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of York, YO10 5DD York, UK
  • ,
  • Peter J.B. Hancock

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, Stirling University, Stirling, FK9 4LA Scotland, UK
  • ,
  • Vesa Kiviniemi

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistics, University of Kuopio, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
  • ,
  • Hannah R. George

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Neouroscience, Newcastle University, NE2 4HH Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
  • ,
  • Martin J. Tovée

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Neouroscience, Newcastle University, NE2 4HH Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.

Received 4 September 2008; accepted 26 April 2009. published online 22 June 2009.

Abstract 

Behavioural studies of the perceptual cues for female physical attractiveness have suggested two potentially important features: body fat distribution [the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)] and overall body fat [often estimated by the body mass index (BMI)]. However, none of these studies tell us directly which regions of the stimulus images inform observers' judgments. Therefore, we recorded the eye movements of three groups of 10 male observers and three groups of 10 female observers, when they rated a set of 46 photographs of female bodies. The first sets of observers rated the images for attractiveness, the second sets rated for body fat and the third sets for WHR. If either WHR and/or body fat is used to judge attractiveness, then observers rating attractiveness should look at those areas of the body which allow assessment of these features, and they should look in the same areas when they are directly asked to estimate WHR and body fat. So we are able to compare the fixation patterns for the explicit judgments with those for attractiveness judgments and infer which features were used for attractiveness. Prior to group analysis of the eye-movement data, the locations of individual eye fixations were transformed into a common reference space to permit comparisons of fixation density at high resolution across all stimuli. This manipulation allowed us to use spatial statistical analysis techniques to show the following: (1) Observers' fixations for attractiveness and body fat clustered in the central and upper abdomen and chest, but not the pelvic or hip areas, consistent with the finding that WHR had little influence over attractiveness judgments. (2) The pattern of fixations for attractiveness ratings was very similar to the fixation patterns for body fat judgments. (3) The fixations for WHR ratings were significantly different from those for attractiveness and body fat.

Keywords: Eye movements, Attractiveness, Waist–hip ratio, Body mass index

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1090-5138(09)00040-3

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.04.003

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 30, Issue 6 , Pages 417-428, November 2009