Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 30, Issue 4 , Pages 238-243, July 2009

Sex differences in response to coalitional threat

  • Daphne Blunt Bugental

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • David A. Beaulieu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Lone Star College, Tomball, TX 77375

Received 25 June 2008; accepted 9 February 2009. published online 13 April 2009.

Abstract 

Intergroup conflict poses a different kind of threat for men and women — a difference that can be expected to have implications for cognitive as well as behavioral processes. Participants were primed with a threat from a rival coalition vs. a control condition. Reaction times were measured on a lexical-decision task in response to ideation consistent with coalitions or with friendship/protective care. When primed for coalitional threat, men showed fast access to positive coalitional ideation (suggesting facilitation). In contrast, women showed exceptionally fast access to positive friendship/protective care ideation. Findings were interpreted as reflecting sexually dimorphic responses to coalitional threat that are consistent with differential advertising of their assets to others.

Keywords: Coalition, Sex differences, Groups

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1090-5138(09)00018-X

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.02.002

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 30, Issue 4 , Pages 238-243, July 2009