Journal Home
Search for

Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 275-281 (July 2008)


View previous. 7 of 10 View next.

Do the aged and knowledgeable men enjoy more prestige? A test of predictions from the prestige-bias model of cultural transmission

Victoria Reyes-GarciaabCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Jose Luis Molinac, James Broeschd, Laura Calvete, Tomas Huancaf, Judith Sausc, Susan Tannerg, William R. Leonardh, Thomas W. McDadeh, TAPS Bolivian Study Team1

Received 7 May 2007; received in revised form 21 February 2008 published online 28 April 2008.

Abstract 

The propensity to imitation over other forms of learning is one of the major differences between humans and other species and one that has allowed for cumulative cultural evolution. However, imitation alone cannot explain increases of average fitness in human populations. Anthropologists have hypothesized that people do not imitate behaviors from random people; rather, transmission of some cultural traits (e.g., healing skills) follows biases designed to extract reproductive benefit from the flow of socially transmitted information. In an article in this journal, Henrich and Gil-White argued that important sources of bias in the acquisition of culturally transmitted information come from prestige processes. Here, we test predictions from the prestige-bias model of cultural transmission. We use quantitative information on ethnomedicinal plant knowledge of adult (age >16) Tsimane' men (n=288) collected during 2005. To measure prestige, we asked Tsimane' to list important villagers and counted the number of nominations each person received. We find weak evidence that prestige is associated with ethnomedicinal plant knowledge, and we find no evidence that prestige is associated with age. Rather, we find a secular decline in prestige by decade of birth. Last, prestige bears a positive association with other attributes, such as participation in village organizations. Future empirical research needs to decouple power from prestige.

a ICREA and Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellatera, Barcelona, Spain

b Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA

c Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain

d Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

e Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellatera, Barcelona, Spain

f CBIDSI-Centro Boliviano de Investigación y de Desarrollo Socio Integral, Correo Central, San Borja, Beni, Bolivia

g Department of Anthropology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA

h Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellatera, Barcelona, Spain. Tel.: +34 93 581 4218; fax: +34 93 581 3331.

 Research was funded by grants from the Cultural Anthropology and Physical Anthropology Programs, NSF (BCS-0134225, BCS-0200767, and BCS-0322380).

1 Tsimane' Amazonian Panel Study, San Borja, Beni, Bolivia.

PII: S1090-5138(08)00027-5

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2008.02.002


View previous. 7 of 10 View next.