Short-term mating strategies and attraction to masculinity in point-light walkers

References 

1. Buss DM, et al. International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 1990;21:5–47
2. Davis RB, Ounpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Human Movement Science. 1991;10:575–587
   • CrossRef
3. Dixson AF, Halliwell G, East R, Wignarajah P, Anderson MJ. Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2003;32:22–39
4. Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Law Smith MJ, Moore FR, DeBruine LM, Cornwell RE, et al. Menstrual cycle, trait estrogen level, and masculinity preferences in the human voice. Hormones and Behavior. 2006;49:215–222
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
5. Fink B, Grammer K, Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2001;115:92–99
6. Folstad I, Karter AJ. Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. The American Naturalist. 1992;139:603–622
   • CrossRef
7. Gangestad SW, Simpson JA. The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2000;23:573–644
8. Gangestad SW, Simpson JA, Cousins AJ, Garver-Apgar CE, Niels Christensen P. Women's preferences for male behavioral displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science. 2004;15:203–207
9. Guida M, Tommaselli GA, Palomba S, Pellicano M, Moccia G, Di Carlo C, et al. Efficacy of methods for determining ovulation in a natural family planning program. Fertility and Sterility. 1999;72:900–904
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (90 KB)
   • CrossRef
10. Jones BC, Little AC, Burt DM, Perrett DI. When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception. 2004;33:569–576
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
11. Johnston VS, Hagel R, Franklin M, Fink B, Grammer K. Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2001;22:251–267
12. Kenrick DT, Keefe RC. Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1992;15:75–133
13. Mather G, Murdoch L. Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 1994;258:273–279
14. Penton-Voak IS, Chen JY. High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2004;25:229–241
15. Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI. Female preference for male faces changes cyclically—Further evidence. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2000;21:39–48
16. Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI, Castles DL, Kobayashi T, Burt DM, Murray LK, et al. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature. 1999;399:741–742
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
17. Provost MP, Kormos C, Kosakowski G, Quinsey VL. Sociosexuality in women and preference for facial masculinization and somatotype in men. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2006;35:305–312
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
18. Simpson JA, Gangestad SW. Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991;60:870–883
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
19. Troje NF. Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision. 2002;2:371–387
    • MEDLINE
20. Troje NF. The little difference: Fourier based gender classification from biological motion. In:  Würtz RP,  Lappe M editor. Dynamic perception. Berlin: Aka Press; 2002;p. 115–120
21. Troje NF. Cat walk and western hero—Motion is expressive. IGSN Report. 2003;40–43
22. Waynforth D, Delwadia S, Camm M. The influence of women's mating strategies on preference for masculine facial architecture. Evolution and Human Behaviour. 2005;26:409–416
23. Zitzmann M, Nieschlag E. Testosterone levels in healthy men and the relation to behavioural and physical characteristics: Facts and constructs. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2001;144:183–197