Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 29, Issue 1 , Pages 19-25 , January 2008

Women's body morphology and preferences for sexual partners' characteristics

  • Boguslaw Pawlowski

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anthropology, University of Wroclaw, 50-138 Wroclaw, Poland
    • Departamento de Ecologia Humana CINVESTAV-IPN, Unidad Mérida, 97310 Mérida, Mexico
    • Institute of Anthropology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 50-951 Wroclaw, Poland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Anthropology, University of Wroclaw, 50-138 Wroclaw, Poland.
    • ,
  • Grazyna Jasienska

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Population Studies, Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian University, 31-531 Cracow, Poland
    • Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Received 18 December 2006 ,Accepted 3 July 2007.

References 

  1. Baize HR, Schroeder JE. Personality and mate selection in personal ads: Evolutionary preferences in a public mate selection process. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1995;10:517–536
  2. Barber N. The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1995;16:395–424
  3. Bereczkei T, Voros S, Gal A, Bernath L. Resources, attractiveness, family commitment; reproductive decisions in human mate choice. Ethology. 1997;103:681–699
  4. Buss DM. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1989;12:1–49
  5. Buunk BP, Dijkstra P, Fetchenhauer D, Kenrick DT. Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships. 2002;9:271–278
  6. Furberg AS, Jasienska G, Bjurstam N, Torjesen PA, Emaus A, Lipson SF, et al. Metabolic and hormonal profiles: HDL cholesterol as a plausible biomarker of breast cancer risk. The Norwegian EBBA study. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention. 2005;14:33–40
  7. Furnham A, Baguma P. Cross-cultural differences in the evaluation of male and female body shapes. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 1994;15:81–89
  8. Furnham A, Moutafi J, Baguma P. A cross-cultural study on the role of weight and waist-to-hip ratio on judgements of women's attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences. 2002;32:729–745
  9. Furnham A, Petrides KV, Constantinides A. The effects of body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio on ratings of female attractiveness, fecundity, and health. Personality and Individual Differences. 2005;38:1823–1834
  10. Greenlees IA, McGrew WC. Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: Analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1994;15:59–72
  11. Henss R. Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness: Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences. 2000;28:501–513
  12. Jasienska G, Ziomkiewicz A, Ellison PT, Lipson SF, Thune I. Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings of the Royal Society B—Biological Sciences. 2004;271:1213–1217
  13. Jones BC, Little AC, Boothroyd L, Feinberg DR, Cornwell RE, DeBruine LM, et al. Women's physical and psychological condition independently predict their preference for apparent health in faces. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2005;26:451–457
  14. Koziel S, Pawlowski B. Comparison between primary and secondary mate markets: An analysis of data from lonely hearts columns. Personality and Individual Differences. 2003;35:1849–1857
  15. Li NP, Bailey JM, Kenrick DT, Linsenmeier JAW. The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;82:947–955
  16. Li NP, Kenrick DT. Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2006;90:468–489
  17. Lipson SF, Ellison PT. Normative study of age variation in salivary progesterone profiles. Journal of Biosocial Science. 1992;24:233–244
  18. Lipson SF, Ellison PT. Comparison of salivary steroid profiles in naturally occurring conception and non-conception cycles. Human Reproduction. 1996;11:2090–2096
  19. Little AC, Burt DM, Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI. Self-perceived attractiveness influences human preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B—Biological Sciences. 2001;268:39–44
  20. Miller GF. How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. In:  Crawford C,  Krebs D editor. Handbook of human evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues and applications. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998;
  21. Nelson LD, Morrison EL. The symptoms of resource scarcity: Judgments of food and finances influence preference for potential partners. Psychological Science. 2005;16:167–173
  22. Nettle D. Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B—Biological Sciences. 2002;269:1919–1923
  23. Pawlowski B. Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in height as a strategy for increasing the pool of potential partners in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B—Biological Sciences. 2003;270:709–712
  24. Pawlowski B, Dunbar R. Withholding age as putative deception in mate search tactics. Evolution and Human Behavior. 1999;20:53–69
  25. Pawlowski B, Dunbar R. Human mate choice strategies. In:  Noe R,  van Hoof J,  Hammerstein P editor. Economics in nature. Social dilemmas, mate choice and biological markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001;p. 187–202
  26. Pawlowski B, Jasienska G. Women's preferences for sexual dimorphism in height depend on menstrual cycle phase and expected duration of relationship. Biological Psychology. 2005;70:38–43
  27. Pawlowski B, Koziel S. The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2002;23:139–149
  28. Penton-Voak IS, Little AC, Jones BC, Burt DM, Tiddeman BP, Perrett DI. Measures of female condition influence preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male Homo sapiens. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2003;117:264–271
  29. Singh D. Body shape and women's attractiveness. The critical role of waist-to-hip ratio. Human Nature—An Interdisciplinary Biosocial Perspective. 1993;4:321–397
  30. Singh D, Young RK. Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breasts, and hips: Role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1995;16:483–507
  31. Smith KL, Cornelissen PL, Tovée MJ. Color 3D bodies and judgements of human female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2007;28:48–54
  32. Swami V, Antonakopoulos N, Tovée MJ, Furnham A. A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of female physical attractiveness in Britain and Greece. Sex Roles. 2006;54:201–211
  33. Swami V, Caprario C, Tovee MJ, Furnham A. Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Japan: A cross-cultural study. European Journal of Personality. 2006;20:69–81
  34. Swami V, Tovée MJ. Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image. 2005;2:115–128
  35. Tovée MJ, Maisey DS, Emery J, Cornelissen PL. Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B—Biological Sciences. 1999;266:211–218
  36. Wass P, Waldenstrom U, Rossner S, Hellberg D. An android body fat distribution in females impairs the pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization–embryo transfer. Human Reproduction. 1997;12:2057–2060
  37. Waynforth D, Dunbar RIM. Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: Evidence from “Lonely hearts' advertisements”. Behaviour. 1995;132:755–779
  38. Wiederman MW. Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1993;14:331–352
  39. Zaadstra BM, Seidell JC, Vannoord PAH, Tevelde ER, Habbema JDF, Vrieswijk B, et al. Fat and female fecundity—Prospective-study of effect of body-fat distribution on conception rates. British Medical Journal. 1993;306:484–487
  40. Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, F., Thune, I., & Jasienska, G. (in press). Body fat, energy balance and estradiol levels: A study based on hormonal profiles from complete menstrual cycles. Human Reproduction.

☆ This study was supported by a grant from the Polish State Committee for Scientific Research (to G.J.).

PII: S1090-5138(07)00071-2

doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.07.003

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 29, Issue 1 , Pages 19-25 , January 2008

Article Tools