Journal Home
Search for

Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 19-25 (January 2008)


View previous. 2 of 8 View next.

Women's body morphology and preferences for sexual partners' characteristics

Boguslaw PawlowskiabcCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Grazyna Jasienskade

Received 18 December 2006; accepted 3 July 2007. published online 28 September 2007.

Abstract 

Mate preferences are condition dependent (i.e., females in better biological condition might be more demanding with respect to fitness-relevant male traits). Such traits usually indicate male biological quality or ability to secure resources that could be invested in offspring. Here we study female preferences for male resources, commitment, attractiveness, good sense of humor, and sensuality (when seeking both long-term and short-term partners) in relation to women's morphological traits such as height, weight, waist and hip girth, body mass index (BMI), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). We show that preferences for resources and attractiveness do indeed depend on women's phenotype. Women with relatively lower WHR and BMI more strongly prefer resources in a potential long-term partner than those with higher WHR and BMI. However, when controlling for age, place of residence, and whether they have had children, it is WHR (but not BMI) that influences female preference for resources and attractiveness. Women with higher WHR (those who, according to many studies, are considered as less attractive) are more prone to prefer physical attractiveness in a potential long-term partner. Furthermore, despite commitment having received the highest score in a long-term context, the preference for this trait in a potential partner was not related to women's body morphology. We suggest evolutionary and proximate explanations for such condition-dependent preferences.

a Department of Anthropology, University of Wroclaw, 50-138 Wroclaw, Poland

b Departamento de Ecologia Humana CINVESTAV-IPN, Unidad Mérida, 97310 Mérida, Mexico

c Institute of Anthropology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 50-951 Wroclaw, Poland

d Department of Epidemiology and Population Studies, Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian University, 31-531 Cracow, Poland

e Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Anthropology, University of Wroclaw, 50-138 Wroclaw, Poland.

 This study was supported by a grant from the Polish State Committee for Scientific Research (to G.J.).

PII: S1090-5138(07)00071-2

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.07.003


View previous. 2 of 8 View next.