Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 28, Issue 6 , Pages 430-438, November 2007

Nepotistic nosiness: inclusive fitness and vigilance of kin members' romantic relationships

  • Jason Faulkner
  • ,
  • Mark Schaller

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada V6T 1Z4.

University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada V6T 1Z4

Received 15 August 2006; accepted 26 June 2007. published online 28 September 2007.

Abstract 

The logic of inclusive fitness suggests that people should be attentive to the mating relationships of their kin—especially their genetically closest kin. This logic further suggests that people will be especially attentive to close kin members' relationships when a greater indirect fitness benefit is at stake. Three studies tested implications of this analysis. The primary results were that (a) people maintain greater vigilance over (and attempt greater influence on) the romantic relationships of genetically closer kin; (b) this effect is largely mediated by feelings of emotional closeness and perceptions of physical similarity; (c) women are more vigilant than men over their kin members' relationships; (d) people are more vigilant over the relationships of female kin, as compared to male kin, but only under conditions with especially clear implications for indirect fitness; and (e) people are more vigilant over kin members' long-term committed relationships, as compared to their casual relationships. These results indicate that a subtle form of nepotism is manifest in people's concern with their kin members' romantic relationships.

Keywords: Differential parental investment, Inclusive fitness, Kinship, Mate choice, Nepotism, Sex differences

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This research was supported by a Killam Predoctoral Fellowship awarded to Jason Faulkner and by a research grant awarded to Mark Schaller by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. We deeply appreciate the financial support.

PII: S1090-5138(07)00067-0

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.06.001

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 28, Issue 6 , Pages 430-438, November 2007