Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 18-27 , January 2007

Facial appearance affects voting decisions

  • Anthony C. Little

      Affiliations

    • School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
    • School of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. School of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.
    • ,
  • Robert P. Burriss

      Affiliations

    • School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
    • ,
  • Benedict C. Jones

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
    • ,
  • S. Craig Roberts

      Affiliations

    • School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

Received 13 October 2005 ,Revised 16 May 2006 ,Accepted 11 September 2006.

References 

  1. Albright L, Kenny DA, Malloy TE. Consensus in personality judgements at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988;55:387–395
  2. Benson PJ, Perrett DI. Synthesising continuous-tone caricatures. Image and Visual Computing. 1991;9:123–129
  3. Buckingham G, DeBruine LM, Little AC, Welling L, Conway C, Tiddeman BP, et al. Visual adaptation to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2006;27:381–389
  4. Budesheim TL, Depaola SJ. Beauty or the beast—the effects of appearance, personality, and issue information on evaluations of political candidates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1994;20(4):339–348
  5. Campbell R, Wallace S, Benson PJ. Real men don't look down: Direction of gaze affects sex decisions on faces. Visual Cognition. 1996;3(4):393–412
  6. Caprara GV, Barbaranelli C, Zimbardo P. Politicians' uniquely simple personalities. Nature. 1997;385:493
  7. Caprara GV, Zimbardo PG. Personalizing politics—A congruency model of political preference. American Psychologist. 2004;59(7):581–594
  8. Chiu RK, Babcock RD. The relative importance of facial attractiveness and gender in Hong Kong selection decisions. International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2002;13(1):141–155
  9. Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1972;24:285–290
  10. Eagly AH, Ashmore RD, Makhijani MG, Longo LC. What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin. 1991;110:109–128
  11. Fink B, Grammer K, Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Schaefer K, Bookstein FL, et al. Second to fourth digit ratio and face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 2005;272:1995–2001
  12. Forsythe SM. Effect of applicants clothing on interviewers decision to hire. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1990;20(19):1579–1595
  13. Hampson SE, Goldberg LR, John Op. Category-breadth and social-desirability values for 573 personality terms. European Journal of Personality. 1987;1:241–258
  14. Hassin R, Trope Y. Facing faces: Studies on the cognitive aspects of physiognomy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000;78:837–852
  15. Henrich J, Gil-White FJ. The evolution of prestige—Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2001;22(3):165–196
  16. Keating CF, Mazur A, Segall MH. A cross-cultural exploration of physiognomic traits of dominance and happiness. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1981;2:41–48
  17. Keating CF, Mazur A, Segall MH. Culture and the perception of social dominance from facial expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1981;40:615–626
  18. Kenny DA, Albright L, Maloy TE, Kashy DA. Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the big five. Psychological Bulletin. 1994;116:245–258
  19. Kraus S. Televised presidential debates and public policy. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988;
  20. Kraut RE, Johnston RE. Social and emotional messages of smiling: An ethological approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979;37:1539–1553
  21. Kyl-Heku LM, Buss DM. Tactics as units of analysis in personality psychology: An illustration using tactics of hierarchy negotiation. Personality and Individual Differences. 1996;21:497–517
  22. Liggett J. The human face. London: Constable; 1974;
  23. Little AC, Burt DM, Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI. Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 2001;268:39–44
  24. Little AC, DeBruine LM, Jones BC. Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences. 2005;272(1578):2283–2287
  25. Little AC, Hancock PJ. The role of masculinity and distinctiveness on the perception of attractiveness in human male faces. British Journal of Psychology. 2002;93:451–464
  26. Little AC, Jones BC, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM, Perrett DI. Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 2002;269:1095–1100
  27. Little AC, Penton-Voak IS, Burt DM, Perrett DI. Individual differences in the perception of attractiveness: How cyclic hormonal changes and self-perceived attractiveness influence female preferences for male faces. In:  Rhodes G,  Zebrowitz L editor. Advances in Social Cognition: Facial Attractiveness. Vol. 1:Westport, CT: Ablex; 2002;p. 59–90
  28. Macrae CN, Milne AB, Bodenhausen GV. Stereotypes as energy-saving devices—a peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;66(1):37–47
  29. Marlowe CM, Schneider SL, Nelson CE. Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased?. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1996;81(1):11–21
  30. Martin DS. Person perception and real-life electoral behavior. Australian Journal of Psychology. 1978;30:255
  31. Mazur A, Booth A. Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1998;21:353–371
  32. Mazur A, Mazur J, Keating C. Military rank attainment of a West Point class: Effects of cadet's physical features. American Journal of Sociology. 1984;90:125–150
  33. Passini FT, Norman WT. A universal conception of personality structure?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1966;4:44–49
  34. Penton-Voak IS, Chen JY. High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2004;25:229–241
  35. Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak IS, Rowland DR, Yoshikawa S, Burt DM, et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature. 1998;394:884–887
  36. Schall JD. Decision making. Current Biology. 2005;15(1):R9–R11
  37. In:  Smuts BB,  Cheney DL,  Seyfarth RM,  Wrangham RW,  Struhsaker TT editor. Primate Societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1987;
  38. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1999;3(12):452–460
  39. Tiddeman BP, Burt DM, Perrett DI. Prototyping and transforming facial texture for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 2001;21:42–50
  40. Todorov A, Mandisodza AN, Goren A, Hall CC. Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science. 2005;308:1623–1626
  41. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1991;43:161–204
  42. Zajonc RB. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1968;9:1–27
  43. Zebrowitz LA. Reading faces. Boulder, CO: WestviewPress; 1997;

PII: S1090-5138(06)00076-6

doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.09.002

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 28, Issue 1 , Pages 18-27 , January 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution