Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 106-111 , March 2007

Physical attractiveness of face and body as indicators of physical fitness in men

  • Johannes Hönekopp

      Affiliations

    • Psychologisches Institut, Technische Universität Chemnitz, D-09120 Chemnitz, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. School of Psychology & Sports Science, Northumbria University, Northumberland Bldg., City Campus, NE1 8ST Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
    • ,
  • Udo Rudolph

      Affiliations

    • Psychologisches Institut, Technische Universität Chemnitz, D-09120 Chemnitz, Germany
    • ,
  • Lothar Beier

      Affiliations

    • Zentrum für Diagnostik, Klinikum Chemnitz, D-09116 Chemnitz, Germany
    • ,
  • Andreas Liebert

      Affiliations

    • Zentrum für Diagnostik, Klinikum Chemnitz, D-09116 Chemnitz, Germany
    • ,
  • Constanze Müller

      Affiliations

    • Psychologisches Institut, Technische Universität Chemnitz, D-09120 Chemnitz, Germany

Received 7 February 2006 ,Accepted 8 September 2006.

References 

  1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182
  2. Bhasin S, Woodhouse L, Storer TW. Hormones and sport. Proof of the effect of testosterone on skeletal muscle. Journal of Endocrinology. 2001;170:27–38
  3. Bouchard C, Shepard RJ. Physical activity, fitness, and health: The model and key concepts. In:  Bouchard C,  Shepard RJ,  Stephens T editor. Physical Activity, Fitness, and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1992;p. 77–88
  4. Bowman RL, DeLucia JL. Accuracy of self-reported weight: A meta-analysis. Behavior Therapy. 1992;23:637–655
  5. Buss DM. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1989;12:1–49
  6. Buss DM. Evolutionary psychology. Boston: Pearson; 2004;
  7. Buss DM, Schmitt DP. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review. 1993;100:204–232
  8. Cunningham MR, Barbee AP, Pike CL. What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;59:61–72
  9. Dixson AF, Halliwell G, East R, Wignarajah P, Anderson MJ. Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2003;32:29–39
  10. Fan J, Dai W, Liu F, Wu J. Visual perception of male body attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B. 2005;272:219–226
  11. Furnham A, Baguma P. Cross-cultural differences in the evaluation of male and female body shapes. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 1994;15:81–89
  12. Gangestad SW, Simpson JA. The evolution of human mating. Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2000;23:573–644
  13. Geary DC. Evolution of life-history trade-offs in mate attractiveness and health: Comment on Weeden and Sabini. Psychological Bulletin. 2005;131:654–657
  14. Gitter AG, Lomranz J, Saxe L. Factors affecting perceived attractiveness of male physiques by American and Israeli students. The Journal of Social Psychology. 1982;118:167–175
  15. Grammer K, Fink B, Møller AP, Thornhill R. Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews. 2003;78:385–407
  16. Haag H. Fitness tests. Schorndorf: Hofmann; 1981;
  17. Hönekopp J. Once more: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Relative contributions of private and shared taste to judgments of facial attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2006;32:199–209
  18. Hönekopp J, Bartholomé T, Jansen G. Facial attractiveness, symmetry, and physical fitness in young women. Human Nature. 2004;15:147–167
  19. Hönekopp J, Becker BT, Oswald FL. The meaning and suitability of various effect sizes for structured rater×ratee designs. Psychological Methods. 2006;11:72–86
  20. Hönekopp J, Manning JT, Müller C. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and physical fitness in males and females: Evidence for effects of prenatal androgens on sexually selected traits. Hormones and Behavior. 2006;
  21. Hönekopp J, Voracek M, Manning JT. 2nd to 4th digit ratio (2D:4D) and number of sex partners: Evidence for effects of prenatal testosterone in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2006;31:30–37
  22. Horvath T. Physical attractiveness: The influence of selected torso parameters. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 1981;10:21–24
  23. Imrhan SN, Imrhan V, Hart C. Can self-estimates of body weight and height be used in place of measurements for college students?. Ergonomics. 1996;39:1445–1453
  24. Johnston VS. Mate choice decisions: The role of facial beauty. Trends in Cognitive Science. 2006;10:9–13
  25. Keeley LH. War before civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996;
  26. Koehler N, Simmons LW, Rhodes G, Peters M. The relationship between sexual dimorphism in human faces and fluctuating asymmetry. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B (Supplement). 2004;271:S233–S236
  27. Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin. 2000;126:390–423
  28. Lavrakas PJ. Female preferences for male physiques. Journal of Research in Personality. 1975;9:324–334
  29. Mackinnon LT. Overtraining effects on immunity and performance in athletes. Immunology and Cell Biology. 2000;78:502–509
  30. Maes HHM, Beunen GP, Vlietinck RF, Neale MC, Thomis M, vanden Eynde B, et al. Inheritance of physical fitness in 10-yr-old twins and their parents. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1996;28:1479–1491
  31. Maisey DS, Vale ELE, Cornelissen PL, Tovée MJ. Characteristics of male attractiveness for women. The Lancet. 1999;353:1500
  32. Malina RM, Bouchard C. Genetic considerations in physical fitness. In: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services  editors. Assessing Physical Fitness and Physical Activity in Population Based Surveys. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1989;
  33. Miller G. The mating mind. How sexual selection shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Anchor Books; 2000;
  34. Nanjee NM, Wheeler MJ. Plasma free testosterone—is an index sufficient?. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. 1985;22:387–390
  35. Penton-Voak IS, Chen JY. High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2004;25:229–241
  36. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology. 2006;57:1–28
  37. Rhodes G, Chan J, Zebrowitz LA, Simmons LW. Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B (Supplement). 2003;70:S93–S95
  38. Rhodes G, Simmons LW, Peters M. Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success?. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2005;26:186–201
  39. Smuts B. Male aggression against women. An evolutionary perspective. Human Nature. 1992;3:1–44
  40. Symons D. The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1979;
  41. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1999;3:452–460
  42. Thornhill R, Grammer K. The body and face of woman: One ornament that signals quality?. Evolution and Human Behavior. 1999;20:105–120
  43. Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In:  Campbell B editors. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Chicago: Aldine; 1972;p. 139–179
  44. Williams GC. Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1966;

PII: S1090-5138(06)00075-4

doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.09.001

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 28, Issue 2 , Pages 106-111 , March 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution