Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 27, Issue 5 , Pages 381-389, September 2006

Visual adaptation to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness

  • Gavin Buckingham

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, AB24 3FX
  • ,
  • Lisa M. DeBruine

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, Scotland, UK, KY16 9AJ
  • ,
  • Anthony C. Little

      Affiliations

    • School of Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, L69 7Z8
  • ,
  • Lisa L.M. Welling

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, AB24 3FX
  • ,
  • Claire A. Conway

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, AB24 3FX
  • ,
  • Bernard P. Tiddeman

      Affiliations

    • School of Computer Science, University of St Andrews, Scotland, UK, KY16 9AJ
  • ,
  • Benedict C. Jones

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, AB24 3FX
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Face Research Laboratory, School of Psychology, William Guild Building, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2UB, Scotland, UK. Tel.: +44 1224 273933; fax: +44 1224 273426.

Received 8 November 2005; accepted 10 March 2006. published online 24 May 2006.

Abstract 

Although previous studies of individual differences in preferences for masculinity in male faces have typically emphasized the importance of factors such as changes in levels of sex hormones during the menstrual cycle, other research has demonstrated that recent visual experience with faces also influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces. Adaptation to either masculine or feminine faces increases preferences for novel faces that are similar to those that were recently seen. Here, we replicate this effect and demonstrate that adaptation to masculine or feminine faces also influences the extent to which masculine faces are perceived as trustworthy. These adaptation effects may reflect a proximate mechanism that contributes to the development of face preferences within individuals, underpins phenomena such as imprinting-like effects and condition-dependent face preferences, and shapes personality attributions to faces that play an important role in romantic partner and associate choices. Furthermore, our findings also support the proposal that visual exposure alone cannot explain the context specificity of attitudes to self-resemblance in faces.

Keywords: Visual adaptation, Face aftereffects, Trust, Sexual dimorphism

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 LMD was supported by a grant from the U.S. National Science Foundation (0401951), ACL was supported by a Royal Society University Research Fellowship, and GB was supported by a studentship from the University of Aberdeen 6th Century.

PII: S1090-5138(06)00017-1

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.03.001

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 27, Issue 5 , Pages 381-389, September 2006