Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 27, Issue 5 , Pages 390-400 , September 2006

Symmetrical women have higher potential fertility

  • Grazyna Jasienska

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Population Studies, Jagiellonian University, Collegium Medicum, 31-531 Krakow, Poland
    • Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University, 34 Concord Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Tel.: +1 617 495 8182; fax: +1 617 495 8136.
  • ,
  • Susan F. Lipson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
  • ,
  • Peter T. Ellison

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
  • ,
  • Inger Thune

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromso, Tromso, Norway
    • Ulleval University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • ,
  • Anna Ziomkiewicz

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology and Population Studies, Jagiellonian University, Collegium Medicum, 31-531 Krakow, Poland

Received 2 November 2005 ,Accepted 10 January 2006.

References 

  1. Adair LS. Size at birth predicts age at menarche. Pediatrics. 2001;107:e59
  2. Al-Eisa E, Egan D, Wassersug R. Fluctuating asymmetry and low back pain. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2004;25:31–37
  3. Baird DD, Weinberg CR, Zhou HB, Kamel F, McConnaughey DR, Kesner JS, et al. Preimplantation urinary hormone profiles and the probability of conception in healthy women. Fertility and Sterility. 1999;71:40–49
  4. Baird DD, Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Kamel F, McConnaughey DR, Musey PI, et al. Preimplantation hormonal differences between the conception and non-conception menstrual cycles of 32 normal women. Human Reproduction. 1997;12:2607–2613
  5. Barrett-Conor E, Bush TL. Estrogen and coronary heart disease in women. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1991;265:1861–1867
  6. Ellison PT. Skeletal growth, fatness and menarcheal age: A comparison of two hypotheses. Human Biology. 1982;54:269–281
  7. Ellison PT. Human salivary steroids: Methodological issues and applications in physical anthropology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology. 1988;31:115–142
  8. Ellison PT. Human ovarian function and reproductive ecology—new hypotheses. American Anthropologist. 1990;92:933–952
  9. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: A model and its implications. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 1999;12:402–416
  10. Gangestad SW, Thornhill R, Yeo RA. Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1994;15:73–85
  11. Grammer K, Fink B, Møller AP, Thornhill R. Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biological Reviews. 2003;78:385–407
  12. Grammer K, Fink B, Møller AP, Manning JT. Physical attractiveness and health: Comment on Weeden and Sabini (2005). Psychological Bulletin. 2005;131:658–661
  13. Grammer K, Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 1994;108:233–243
  14. Gorkemli H, Ak D, Akyurek C, Aktan M, Duman S. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of progesterone or progesterone plus estradiol for luteal phase support in ICSI–ET cycles. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 2004;58:140–144
  15. Henderson JJA, Anglin JM. Facial attractiveness predicts longevity. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2003;24:351–356
  16. Henss R. Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences. 2000;28:501–513
  17. Hume DK, Montgomerie R. Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of “quality” in women and men. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2001;22:93–112
  18. Jacobson JD, Ansari MA. Immunomodulatory actions of gonadal steroids may be mediated by gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Endocrinology. 2004;145:330–336
  19. Jasienska G. Are sex steroids suitable as biomarkers of breast cancer risk? Variation and repeatability of estimates. International Journal of Cancer. 2002;(Suppl 13):129
  20. Jasienska G, Ellison PT. Physical work causes suppression of ovarian function in women. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 265:1998;p. 1847–1851
  21. Jasienska G, Ellison PT. Energetic factors and seasonal changes in ovarian function in women from rural Poland. American Journal of Human Biology. 2004;16:563–580
  22. Jasienska G, Thune I. Lifestyle, hormones, and risk of breast cancer. British Medical Journal. 2001;322:586–587
  23. Jasienska G, Thune I. Lifestyle, progesterone and breast cancer. British Medical Journal. 2001;323:1002
  24. Jasienska G, Thune I, Ellison PT. Energetic factors, ovarian steroids and the risk of breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer Prevention. 2000;9:231–239
  25. Jasienska G, Ziomkiewicz A, Ellison PT, Lipson SF, Thune I. Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 271:2004;p. 1213–1217
  26. Jasienska G, Ziomkiewicz A, Lipson SF, Thune I, Ellison PT. High ponderal index at birth predicts high estradiol levels in adult women. American Journal of Human Biology. 2006;18:133–140
  27. Jasienska G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Thune I., Lipson, S. F., Ellison, P. T. (in press). Habitual physical activity and estradiol levels in women of reproductive age. European Journal of Cancer Prevention.
  28. Jones BC, Little AC, Penton-Voak IS, Tiddeman BP, Burt DM, Perrett DI. Facial symmetry and judgments of apparent health—Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2001;22:417–429
  29. Key TJA, Pike MC. The role of oestrogens and progestogens in the epidemiology and prevention of breast cancer. European Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1988;24:29–43
  30. Kowner R. Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance. 1996;22:662–675
  31. Kovacs EJ, Messingham KAN, Gregory MS. Estrogen regulation of immune responses after injury. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2002;193:129–135
  32. Lipson SF, Ellison PT. Comparison of salivary steroid profiles in naturally occurring conception and non-conception cycles. Human Reproduction. 1996;11:2090–2096
  33. Lukaszuk K, Liss J, Lukaszuk M, Maj B. Optimization of estradiol supplementation during the luteal phase improves the pregnancy rate in women undergoing in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer cycles. Fertility and Sterility. 2005;83:1372–1376
  34. Manning JT. Fluctuating asymmetry and body weight in men and women—implications for sexual selection. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1995;16:145–153
  35. Manning JT, Koukourakis K, Brodie DA. Fluctuating asymmetry, metabolic rate and sexual selection in human males. Evolution and Human Behavior. 1997;18:15–21
  36. Manning JT, Scutt D, Lewis-Jones DI. Developmental stability, ejaculate size, and sperm quality in men. Evolution and Human Behavior. 1998;19:273–282
  37. Manning JT, Scutt D, Whitehouse GH, Leinster SJ. Breast asymmetry and phenotypic quality in women. Evolution and Human Behavior. 1997;18:223–236
  38. Martin SM, Manning JT, Dowrick CF. Fluctuating asymmetry, relative digit length, and depression in men. Evolution and Human Behavior. 1999;20:203–214
  39. Milne BJ, Belsky J, Poulton R, Thomson WM, Caspi A, Kieser J. Fluctuating asymmetry and physical health among young adults. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2003;24:53–63
  40. Møller AP, Soler M, Thornhill R. Breast asymmetry, sexual selection, and human reproductive success. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1995;16:207–219
  41. Møller AP, Swaddle JP. Asymmetry, developmental stability, and evolution. Oxford, London: Oxford University Press; 1997;
  42. Nguyen TV, Jones G, Sambrook PN, White CP, Kelly PJ, Eisman JA. Effects of estrogen exposure and reproductive factors on bone mineral density and osteoporotic fractures. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1995;80:2709–2714
  43. Noor F, Evans DC. The effect of facial symmetry on perceptions of personality and attractiveness. Journal of Research in Personality. 2003;37:339–347
  44. Pike MC, Spicer DV, Dahmoush L, Press MF. Estrogens, progestogens, normal breast cell proliferation, and breast cancer risk. Epidemiologic Reviews. 1993;15:17–35
  45. Rhodes G, Zebrowitz LA, Clark A, Kalick SM, Hightower A, McKay R. Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health?. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2001;22:31–46
  46. Romundstad PR, Vatten LJ, Nilsen TIL, Holmen TL, Hsieh CC, Trichopoulos D, et al. Birth size in relation to age at menarche and adolescent body size: Implications for breast cancer risk. International Journal of Cancer. 2003;105:400–403
  47. Shackelford TK, Larsen RJ. Facial asymmetry as an indicator of psychological, emotional, and physiological distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;72:456–466
  48. Sharara FI, McClamrock HD. Ratio of oestradiol concentration on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration to mid-luteal oestradiol concentration is predictive of in-vitro fertilization outcome. Human Reproduction. 1999;14:2777–2782
  49. Singh D. Body shape and women's attractiveness—the critical role of waist-to-hip ratio. Human nature—an interdisciplinary biosocial perspective. 1993;4:297–321
  50. Soler C, Nunez M, Gutierrez R, Nunez J, Medina P, Sancho M, et al. Facial attractiveness in men provides clues to semen quality. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2003;24:199–207
  51. Swaddle JP, Cuthill IC. Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness—symmetry may not always be beautiful. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 261:1995;p. 111–116
  52. Symons D. Beauty is in the adaptation of the beholder: The evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In:  Abramson PR,  Pikerton SD editor. Sexual nature, sexual culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1995;p. 80–118
  53. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. Human fluctuating asymmetry and sexual behavior. Psychological Science. 1994;5:297–302
  54. Tomkinson G, Olds T. Physiological correlates of bilateral symmetry in humans. International Journal of Sports Medicine. 2000;21:545–550
  55. Vermeulen A. Environment, human reproduction, menopause, and andropause. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1993;2:91–100
  56. Waynforth D. Fluctuating asymmetry and human male life-history traits in rural Belize. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 265:1998;p. 1497–1501
  57. Weeden J, Sabini J. Physical attractiveness and health in Western societies: A review. Psychological Bulletin. 2005;131:635–663
  58. Wood JW. Dynamics of human reproduction: Biology, biometry, demography. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1994;

PII: S1090-5138(06)00004-3

doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.01.001

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 27, Issue 5 , Pages 390-400 , September 2006