Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: the effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes
Affiliations
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA
- UCLA Center for Behavior, Evolution and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Department of Psychology, Harvard University 962 William James Hall, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Correspondence information about the author Carlos David NavarreteAffiliations
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA
- UCLA Center for Behavior, Evolution and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA
Correspondence
- Corresponding author. Department of Psychology, Harvard University 962 William James Hall, 33 Kirkland St, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Affiliations
- UCLA Center for Behavior, Evolution and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA
- Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA
Article Info
To view the full text, please login as a subscribed user or purchase a subscription. Click here to view the full text on ScienceDirect.
Abstract
Extending a model relating xenophobia to disease avoidance [Faulkner, J., Schaller, M., Park, J. H., & Duncan, L. A. (2004). Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(4), 333–353.], we argue that both inter- and intragroup attitudes can be understood in terms of the costs and benefits of interacting with the in-group versus out-groups. In ancestral environments, interaction with members of the in-group will generally have posed less risk of disease transmission than interaction with members of an out-group, as individuals will have possessed antibodies to many of the pathogens present in the former, in contrast to those prevalent among the latter. Moreover, because coalitions are more likely among in-group members, the in-group would have been a potential source of aid in the event of debilitating illness. We conducted two online studies exploring the relationship between disease threat and intergroup attitudes. Study 1 found that ethnocentric attitudes increase as a function of perceived disease vulnerability. Study 2 found that in-group attraction increases as a function of disgust sensitivity, both when measured as an individual difference variable and when experimentally primed. We discuss these results with attention to the relationships among disease salience, out-group negativity, and in-group attraction.
Keywords:
Coalition formation, Disgust sensitivity, Fear of death, In-group, Out-group, Intergroup bias, PrejudiceTo access this article, please choose from the options below
Purchase access to this article
Claim Access
If you are a current subscriber with Society Membership or an Account Number, claim your access now.
Subscribe to this title
Purchase a subscription to gain access to this and all other articles in this journal.
Institutional Access
Visit ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
Article Tools
Related Articles
Searching for related articles..
