Production and appreciation of humor as sexually selected traits

References 

1. Bateman AJ. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity. 1948;2:349–368
   • CrossRef
2. Berkovits I, Hancock G. Bootstrap resampling approaches for repeated measures designs: Relative robustness to sphericity and normality violations. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 2000;60:877–892
3. Bippus AM. Making sense of humor in young romantic relationships: Understanding partners' perceptions. Humor. 2000;13:395–417
4. Bressler ER, Balshine S. The influence of humor on desirability. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2004;27:29–39
5. Buss DM, Barnes M. Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;50:559–570
   • CrossRef
6. Daniel H, O'Brien KF, McCabe RB, Quinter VE. Values in mate selection: A 1984 campus survey. College Student Journal. 1985;15:44–50
7. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ. An introduction to bootstrap. New York: CRC Press; 1993;
8. Feingold A. Testing equity as an explanation for romantic couples “mismatched” on physical attractiveness. Psychological Reports. 1981;49:247–250
   • CrossRef
9. Feingold A. Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:125–139
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
10. Goodwin R. Sex differences among partner preferences: Are the sexes really very similar?. Sex Roles. 1990;23:501–513
11. Grammer K, Eibl-Eibesfeldt I. The ritualisation of laughter. In:  Koch W editors. Naturalichkeit der Sprache un der Kulture: Acta colloquii. Bochum: Brockmeyer; 1990;p. 192–214
12. Hendel DD. Mate selection values of high school and college students. Counselling and Values. 1978;22:127–133
13. Hofstee WKB, Ten Berge JMF. Personality in proportion: A bipolar proportional scale for personality assessments and its consequences for trait structure. Journal of Personality Assessment. 2004;83:120–127
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
14. Jadwiszczak P. Rundom projects: An application for randomization and bootstrap testing, Version 1.1. Computer program available from the web site http://pjadw.tripod.com2003;
15. Lundy DE, Tan J, Cunningham MR. Heterosexual romantic preferences: The importance of humour and physical attractiveness for different types of relationships. Personal Relationships. 1998;5:311–325
16. Miller GF. The mating mind. New York: Random House; 2000;
17. Miller GF. Sexual selection for indicators of intelligence. In:  Bock G,  Goode J,  Webb K editor. The nature of intelligence. Novartis Foundation Symposium 233. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2000;p. 260–275
18. Miller GF. Mental traits as fitness indicators: Expanding evolutionary psychology's adaptationism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2000;907:62–74
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
19. Miller GF. Aesthetic fitness: How sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts. 2001;2:20–25
20. Murstein B, Brust R. Humor and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1985;49:637–640
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
21. Priest RF, Thein MT. Humor appreciation in marriage: Spousal similarity, assortative mating, and disaffection. Humor. 2003;16:63–78
22. Rust J, Goldstein J. Humor in marital adjustment. Humor. 1989;2:217–223
23. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell, ed., Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, 136–179. Heinemann, London.
24. Ziv A. Humor's role in married life. Humor. 1988;1:223–229