Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 145-157 , March 2006

Cues of parental investment as a factor in attractiveness

Received 22 January 2004 ,Accepted 28 June 2005.

References 

  1. Anderson KG, Kaplan H, Lancaster J. Paternal care by genetic fathers and step-fathers: I. Reports from Albuquerque men. Evolution and Human Behavior. 1999;20:405–431
  2. Buss DM. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1989;12:1–49
  3. Buss DM. Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1999;
  4. Buss DM. Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. 2nd ed.. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2003;
  5. Buss DM, Reeve HK. Evolutionary psychology and developmental dynamics: Comment on Lickliter and Honneycutt (2003). Psychological Bulletin. 2003;129:848–853
  6. Geary DC. Evolution and proximate expression of human parental investment. Psychological Bulletin. 2000;126:55–77
  7. Kenrick D, Groth G, Trost M, Sadalla E. Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993;64:951–969
  8. La Cerra, M. M. (1995). Evolved mate preferences in women: Psychological adaptations for assessing a man's willingness to invest in offspring. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara (Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering Mar 1995, Vol 55(9-B), p. 4149).
  9. Simpson JA, Gangestad SW. Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991;60:870–883

PII: S1090-5138(05)00058-9

doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.003

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 27, Issue 2 , Pages 145-157 , March 2006

Article Tools