Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 27, Issue 1 , Pages 29-39 , January 2006

The influence of humor on desirability

  • Eric R. Bressler

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Westfield State College, P.O. Box 1630, Westfield, MA 01086-1630, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 413 572 5719; fax: +1 413 572 8062.
    • ,
  • Sigal Balshine

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1

Received 15 December 2004 ,Accepted 20 June 2005.

References 

  1. Alexander R. Ostracism and indirect reciprocity: The reproductive significance of humor. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1986;7:253–270
  2. Andersson M. Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1994;
  3. Apte M. Ethnic humor versus “sense of humor”: An American sociocultural dilemma. American Behavioral Scientist. 1987;30:27–41
  4. Bippus AM. Making sense of humor in young romantic relationships: Understanding partners' perceptions. Humor. 2000;13:395–417
  5. Chapman AJ. Social facilitation of laughter in children. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1973;9:528–541
  6. Chapman AJ, Chapman WA. Responsiveness to humor: It's dependency upon a companion's humorous smiling and laughter. Journal of Psychology. 1974;88:245–252
  7. Daly M, Wilson M. Sex, evolution and behavior. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing; 1983;
  8. Dion K, Berscheid K, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1972;42:285–290
  9. Feingold A. Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin. 1992;112:125–139
  10. Goodwin R. Sex differences among partner preferences: Are the sexes really very similar?. Sex Roles. 1990;23:501–513
  11. Grammer K, Eibl-Eibesfeldt I. The ritualisation of laughter. In:  Koch W editors. Naturalichkeit der Sprache un der Kultur: Acta colloquii. Bochum: Brockmeyer; 1990;p. 192–214
  12. Hansen SL. Dating choices of high school students. Family Coordinator. 1977;26:133–138
  13. Haselton MG, Buss DM. Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000;78:81–91
  14. Hewitt LE. Student perceptions of traits desired in themselves as dating and marriage partners. Marriage and Family Living. 1958;20:344–349
  15. Kenrick D, Groth G, Trost M, Sadhalla E. Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993;64:951–969
  16. Kenrick D, Sadhalla E, Groth G, Trost M. Evolution, traits, and the stages of the parental investment model. Journal of Personality. 1990;58:97–117
  17. Lundy DE, Tan J, Cunningham MR. Heterosexual romantic preferences: The importance of humor and physical attractiveness for different types of relationships. Personal Relationships. 1998;5:311–325
  18. Malpass LF, Fitzpatrick ED. Social facilitation as a factor in reaction to humor. Journal of Social Psychology. 1959;50:295–303
  19. Martin RA. Approaches to the sense of humor: A historical review. In:  Ruch W editors. The Sense of humor: Explorations of a personality characteristic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 1998;
  20. Martin RA, Kuiper N. Daily occurrence of laughter: Relationships with age, gender, and Type A personality. Humor. 1999;12:355–384
  21. Martin RA, Lefcourt H. Situational humor response questionnaire: Quantitative measure of the sense of humor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1984;47:145–155
  22. McGhee PE. Humor: Its origin and development. San Francisco: Freeman; 1979;
  23. Miller GF. How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. In:  Crawford C,  Krebs D editor. Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998;p. 87–130
  24. Miller GF. The mating mind. New York: Random House; 2000;
  25. Miller GF. Sexual selection for indicators of intelligence. In:  Bock G,  Goode J,  Webb K editor. The nature of intelligence. Novartis Foundation Symposium 233. Chichester: Wiley; 2000;p. 260–275
  26. Miller GF. Mental traits as fitness indicators: Expanding evolutionary psychology's adaptationism. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2000;907:62–74
  27. Miller GF. Aesthetic fitness: How sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts. 2001;2:20–25
  28. Nisbett RE, Wilson TD. The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1977;35:250–256
  29. Provine RR. Laughter punctuates speech: Linguistic, social and gender contexts of laughter. Ethology. 1993;95:291–298
  30. Robinson DT, Smith-Lovin L. Getting a laugh: Gender, status, and humor in task discussions. Social Forces. 2001;80:123–158
  31. Simpson JA, Gangestad SW, Christensen PN, Leck K. Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999;76:159–172
  32. Smith JE, Waldorf VA, Trembath DL. “Single white male looking for thin, very attractive…”. Sex Roles. 1990;23:675–685
  33. Sprecher S, Regan P. Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2002;19:463–481
  34. Todosijevic B, Snezana L, Arancic A. Mate selection criteria: A trait desirability assessment study of sex differences in Serbia. Evolutionary Psychology. 2003;1:116–126
  35. Weisfeld GE. Adaptive value of humor and laughter. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1993;14:141–169

PII: S1090-5138(05)00056-5

doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.002

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 27, Issue 1 , Pages 29-39 , January 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution