Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 26, Issue 5 , Pages 375-387, September 2005

Altruistic punishing and helping differ in sensitivity to relatedness, friendship, and future interactions

  • Rick O'Gorman

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA
  • ,
  • David Sloan Wilson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA
    • Department of Anthropology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA. Tel.: +1 607 777 4393; fax: +1 607 777 6521.
  • ,
  • Ralph R. Miller

      Affiliations

    • Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA

Received 26 January 2004; accepted 17 December 2004. published online 27 July 2005.

Abstract

Altruism is behaviorally defined as an act that benefits others at the expense of the actor. Altruism is usually associated with helping others in need, but it can also take place in the context of punishment. People who help to maintain cooperation by punishing cheaters are benefiting others at their own expense as surely as if they performed acts of overt helping. The proximate psychological mechanisms that motivate altruistic helping and altruistic punishment are almost certainly different from each other (e.g., empathy vs. moralistic anger). We present two studies suggesting that the impulse to altruistically help and altruistically punish differ in their sensitivity to information regarding genetic relatedness and probability of future interactions. This interesting empirical result is relevant to the interpretation of altruistic punishment as an evolved adaptation versus a byproduct of modern environments, and to the evolution of psychological traits associated with morality.

Keywords: Altruism, Altruistic punishment, Altruistic helping, Kin selection, Reciprocity, Morality

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1090-5138(04)00112-6

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.12.006

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 26, Issue 5 , Pages 375-387, September 2005