Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 26, Issue 3 , Pages 213-226 , May 2005

MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness

  • S. Craig Roberts

      Affiliations

    • School of Clinical Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 4HH, UK
    • School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK. Tel.: +44 151 795 4514; fax: +44 151 795 4408.
    • ,
  • Anthony C. Little

      Affiliations

    • School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK
    • ,
  • L. Morris Gosling

      Affiliations

    • School of Clinical Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 4HH, UK
    • ,
  • David I. Perrett

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews KY16 9JU, UK
    • ,
  • Vaughan Carter

      Affiliations

    • National Blood Service, Holland Drive, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE2 4NQ, UK
    • ,
  • Benedict C. Jones

      Affiliations

    • School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2UB, UK
    • ,
  • Ian Penton-Voak

      Affiliations

    • Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TN, UK
    • ,
  • Marion Petrie

      Affiliations

    • School of Clinical Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 4HH, UK

Received 1 April 2004 ,Accepted 9 September 2004.

References 

  1. Andersson M. Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994;
  2. Aparicio JM, Cordero PJ, Veiga JP. A test of the hypothesis of mate choice based on heterozygosity in the spotless starling. Animal Behavior. 2001;62:1001–1006
  3. Bateman AJ. Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity. 1948;2:349–368
  4. Bernatchez L, Landry C. MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: what have we learned about natural selection in 15 years?. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2003;16:363–377
  5. Brown JL. A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behavioural Ecology. 1997;8:60–65
  6. Brown JL. The new heterozygosity theory of mate choice and the MHC. Genetica. 1999;104:215–221
  7. Budowle B, Koons BW, Moretti TR. Subtyping of the HLA-DQA1 locus and independence testing with PM and STR/VNTR loci. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 1998;43:657–660
  8. Carrington M, Nelson GW, Martin MP, Kissner T, Vlahov D, Goedert JJ, et al. HLA and HIV-1: heterozygote advantage and B*35-Cw*04 disadvantage. Science. 1999;283:1748–1752
  9. Colegrave N, Kotiaho JS, Tomkins JL. Mate choice or polyandry: reconciling genetic compatibility and good genes sexual selection. Evolutionary Ecology Research. 2002;4:911–917
  10. Cornwell RE, Boothroyd L, Burt DM, Feinberg DR, Jones BC, Little AC, et al. Concordant preferences for opposite-sex signals? Human pheromones and facial characteristics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 2004;271:635–640
  11. Cunningham MR. Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;50(5):925–935
  12. Fink B, Grammar K, Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 2001;115:92–99
  13. Fink B, Penton-Voak I. Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences. 2002;11:154–158
  14. Foerster K, Delhey K, Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT, Kempenaers B. Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness through extra-pair matings. Nature. 2003;425:714–717
  15. Griffiths RW, Kunz PR. Assortative mating: a study of physiognomic homogamy. Social Biology. 1973;20:448–453
  16. Gudjonsson JE, Karason A, Antonsdottir A, Runarsdottir EH, Hauksson VB, Upmanyu R, et al. Psoriasis patients who are homozygous for the HLA-Cw*0602 allele have a 2.5-fold increased risk of developing psoriasis compared with Cw6 heterozygotes. British Journal of Dermatology. 2003;148:233–235
  17. Hasselquist D, Bensch S, Schantz TV. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature. 1996;381:229–232
  18. Hinsz VB. Facial resemblance in engaged and married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1989;6:223–229
  19. Jacob S, McClintock MK, Zelano B, Ober C. Paternally inherited HLA alleles are associated with women's choice of male odor. Nature Genetic. 2002;30:175–179
  20. Jones BC, Little AC, Penton-Voak IS, Tiddeman BP, Burt DM, Perrett DI. Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health—Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship. Evolution of Human Behavior. 2001;22:417–429
  21. Jones BC, Little AC, Feinberg DR, Penton-Voak IS, Tiddeman BP, Perrett DI. The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness. Evolution of Human Behavior. 2004;25:24–30
  22. Jones BC, Little AC, Burt DM, Perrett PI. When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception. 2004;33:569–576
  23. Jordan WC, Bruford MW. New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Heredity. 1998;81:239–245
  24. Kalick SM, Zebrowitz LA, Langlois JH, Johnson RM. Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal data on an evolutionary question. Psychologica Science. 1998;9(1):8–13
  25. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature. 1991;350:33–38
  26. Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallamm M, Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin. 2000;126:390–423
  27. McClelland EE, Granger DL, Potts WK. Major histocompatibility complex-dependent susceptibility to Cryptococcus neoformans in mice. Infection and Immunity. 2003;71(8):4815–4817
  28. McClelland EE, Penn DJ, Potts WK. Major histocompatibility complex heterozygote superiority during coinfection. Infection and Immunity. 2003;71:2079–2086
  29. Mungall AJ, Palmer SA, Sims SK, Edwards CA, Ashurst JL, Wilming L, et al. The DNA sequence and analysis of human chromosome 6. Nature. 2003;425:805–811
  30. Penn D, Potts WK. How do major histocompatibility complex genes influence odor and mating preferences?. Advances if Immunology. 1998;69:411–436
  31. Penn DJ, Damjanovich K, Potts WK. MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99:11260–11264
  32. Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI. Male facial attractiveness: perceived personality and shifting female preferences for male traits across the menstrual cycle. Advances in the Study of Behavior. 2001;30:219–259
  33. Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI, Castles DL, Kobayashi T, Burt DM, Murray LK, et al. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature. 1999;399(6738):741–742
  34. Penton-Voak I, Perrett D, Pierce J. Computer graphic studies of the role of facial similarity in attractiveness judgements. Current Psychology. 1999;18:104–117
  35. Penton-Voak IS, Jones BC, Little AC, Baker S, Tiddeman B, Burt DM, et al. Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 2001;268:1617–1623
  36. Perrett DI, Burt DM, Penton-Voak IS, Lee KJ, Rowland DA, Edwards R. Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution of Human Behavior. 1999;20(5):295–307
  37. Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak IS, Rowland DR, Yoshikawa S, Burt DM, et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature. 1998;394:884–887
  38. Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S. Facial shape and judgments of female attractiveness. Nature. 1994;368(6468):239–242
  39. Petrie M. Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature. 1994;371:598–599
  40. Pollard J, Shepherd J, Shepherd J. Average faces are average faces. Current Psychology. 1999;18:98–103
  41. Potts WK, Manning CJ, Wakeland EK. Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature. 1991;352:619–621
  42. Reusch TBH, Haberli MA, Aeschlimann PB, Milinski M. Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism. Nature. 2001;414:300–302
  43. Rhodes G, Chan J, Zebrowitz LA, Simmons LW. Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 2003;270:S93–S95(Suppl.)
  44. Rhodes G, Zebrowitz LA, Clark A, Kalick SM, Hightower A, McKay R. Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health?. Evolution of Human Behavior. 2001;22:31–46
  45. Roberts SC, Gosling LM. Genetic similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice. Nature Genetics. 2003;35:103–106
  46. Roberts SC, Havlicek J, Flegr J, Hruskova M, Little AC, Jones BC, et al. Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 2004;271:S270–S272(Suppl.)
  47. Sauermann U, Nürnberg P, Bercovitch FB, Berard JD, Trefilov A, Widdig A, et al. Increased reproductive success of MHC class II heterozygous males among free-ranging rhesus macaques. Human Genetics. 2001;108:249–254
  48. Scheib JE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. Facial attractiveness, symmetry, and cues to good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 1999;266:1913–1917
  49. Shackelford TK, Larsen RJ. Facial attractiveness and physical health. Evolution of Human Behavior. 1999;20:71–76
  50. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry. 3rd ed.. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1995;
  51. Tang JM, Costello C, Keet IPM, Rivers C, LeBlanc S, Karita E, et al. HLA class I homozygosity accelerates disease progression in human immunodeficiency virus type I infection. AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses. 1999;15:317–324
  52. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1999;3(12):452–460
  53. Thornhill R, Gangestad SW, Miller R, Scheyd G, McCullough JK, Franklin M. Major histocompatibility genes, symmetry and body scent attractiveness in men and women. Behavioral Ecology. 2003;14:668–678
  54. Thursz MR, Thomas HC, Greenwood BM, Hill AV. Heterozygote advantage for HLA class-II type in hepatitis B virus infection. Nature Genetics. 1997;17:11–12
  55. Trivers RL. Parental investment and sexual selection. In:  Campbell B editors. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. London: Heinemann Press; 1972;p. 136–179
  56. Wedekind C, Furi S. Body odor preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 1997;264:1471–1479
  57. Wedekind C, Seebeck T, Bettens F, Paepke AJ. MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 1995;260:245–249
  58. Yamaguchi M, Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Bard J, Thomas L, Boyse EA. Distinctive urinary odors governed by the major histocompatibility locus of the mouse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1981;78:5817–5820

PII: S1090-5138(04)00078-9

doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.09.002

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 26, Issue 3 , Pages 213-226 , May 2005

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution