Resemblance to self increases the appeal of child faces to both men and women

References 

1. Austin W, McGinn NC. Sex differences in choice of distribution rules. Journal of Personality. 1977;45:379–394
   • CrossRef
2. Brédart S, French RM. Do babies resemble their fathers more than their mothers? A failure to replicate Christenfeld and Hill (1995). Evolution and Human Behavior. 1999;20:129–135
3. Bressan P. Why babies look like their daddies: paternity uncertainty and the evolution of self-deception in evaluating family resemblance. Acta Ethologica. 2002;4:113–118
4. Bressan, P., & Grassi, M. Parental resemblance in one-year-olds and the Gaussian curve. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 133–141.
5. Burch RL, Gallup GG. Perceptions of paternal resemblance predict family violence. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2000;21:429–435
6. Christenfeld , Hill . Whose baby are you?. Nature. 1995;378:669
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
7. Daly M, Wilson M. A sociobiological analysis of human infanticide. In:  Hausfater G,  Hrdy S editor. Infanticide: comparative and evolutionary perspectives. New York: Aldine Press; 1984;p. 487–502
8. DeBruine LM. Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 2002;269:1307–1312
9. DeBruine, L. M. Context-specific responses to a cue of kinship: Facial resemblance increases the attractiveness of same-sex faces more than other-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. Submitted for publication.
10. Euler HA, Weitzel B. Grandparental caregiving and intergenerational relations reflect reproductive strategies. In:  van der Dennen JM,  Smillie D,  Wilson DR editor. The Darwinian heritage and sociobiology. Human evolution, behavior, and intelligence. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers; 1999;p. 243–252
11. Gaulin SJC, McBurney DH, Wartell SLB. Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles: a consequence and measure of paternity uncertainty. Human Nature. 1997;8:139–151
12. Kahn A, O'Leary VE, Krulewitz JE, Lamm H. Equity and equality: male and female means to a just end. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1980;1:173–197
13. McLain DK, Setters D, Moulton MP, Pratt AE. Ascription of resemblance of newborns by parents and nonrelatives. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2000;21:11–23
14. Neff BD, Sherman PW. Decision making and recognition mechanisms. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. 2002;269:1435–1441
15. Nesse RM, Silverman A, Bortz A. Sex differences in ability to recognize family resemblance. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1990;11:11–21
16. Pagel M. Desperately concealing father: a theory of parent–infant resemblance. Animal Behaviour. 1997;53:973–981
    • CrossRef
17. Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI, Peirce JW. Computer graphic studies of the role of facial similarity in judgments of attractiveness. Current Psychology. 1999;18:104–117
18. Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak I, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S, Burt DM, et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature. 1998;394:884–887
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
19. Platek SM, Burch RL, Panyavin IS, Wasserman BH, Gallup GG. Reactions to children's faces: resemblance affects males more than females. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2002;23:159–166
20. Platek SM, Critton SR, Burch RL, Frederick DA, Meyers TE, Gallup GG. How much paternal resemblance is enough? Sex differences in hypothetical investment decisions but not in the detection of resemblance. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2003;24:81–87
21. Rhodes G, Halberstadt J, Brajkovich G. Generalization of mere exposure effects to averaged composite faces. Social Cognition. 2001;19:57–70
22. Tiddeman B, Perrett D, Burt D. Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, Research. 2001;21:42–50
23. Volk A, Quinsey VL. The influence of infant facial cues on adoption preferences. Human Nature. 2002;13:437–455