Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 24, Issue 2 , Pages 88-98 , March 2003

Waist–hip ratio and attractiveness: New evidence and a critique of “a critical test”

Received 18 March 2002 ,Accepted 20 August 2002.

References 

  1. American Psychological Association . Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist. 1992;47:1597–1611
  2. Barrett L, Dunbar R, Lycett J. Human evolutionary psychology. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2002;
  3. Buss DM. Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1989;12:1–49
  4. Furnham A, Lavancy M, McClelland A. Waist to hip ratio and facial attractiveness: a pilot study. Personality and Individual Differences. 2001;30:491–502
  5. Furnham A, Tan T, McManus C. WHR and preferences for body shape: a replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences. 1997;22:539–549
  6. Gordon CC, Churchill T, Clauser CE, Bradtmilller B, McConville JT, Tebbbets I, et al. 1988 Anthropometric survey of U.S. Army personnel: methods and summary statistics: final report. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center; 1989;NATICK/TR-89/044, AD A225 094
  7. Helson H. Adaptation-level theory: an experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York: Harper & Row; 1964;
  8. Henss R. WHR and attractiveness. Replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences. 1995;19:479–498
  9. Henss, R. (1998). Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness of the human figure. Retrieved November 1998, from University of the Saarland: http://www.cops.uni-saarland.de/ronald/PICTURES/WHRARCHV/WHRJPG/FIG4_1.JPG.
  10. Henss R. WHR and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences. 2000;28:501–513
  11. Jones D. An evolutionary perspective on physical attractiveness. Evolutionary Anthropology. 1997;5:97–109
  12. Ley CJ, Lees B, Stevenson JC. Sex- and menopause-associated change in body fat distribution. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1992;55:950–954
  13. Manning JT, Trivers RL, Singh D, Thornhill R. The mystery of female beauty. Nature. 1999;399:214–215
  14. Pirwany IR, Fleming R, Greer CJ, Packard CJ, Sattar N. Lipids and lipoprotein subfractions in women with PCOS: relationship to metabolic and endocrine parameters. Clinical Endocrinology. 2001;54:447–453
  15. Singh D. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993;65:293–307
  16. Singh D. Body shape and women's attractiveness: the critical role of waist–hip ratio. Human Nature. 1993;4:297–321
  17. Singh D. Is thin really beautiful and good? Relationship between WHR and female attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences. 1994;16:123–132
  18. Singh D. Ideal female body shape: role of body weight and WHR. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 1994;16:283–288
  19. Singh D. WHR and judgments of attractiveness and healthiness by male and female physicians. International Journal of Obesity. 1994;18:731–737
  20. Singh D. Body fat distribution and perception of desirable female body shape by young black men and women. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 1994;16:289–294
  21. Singh D. Female health, attractiveness and desirability for relationships: role of breast asymmetry and WHR. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1995;16:465–481
  22. Singh D, Luis S. Ethnic and gender consensus for the effect of WHR on judgment of women's attractiveness. Human Nature. 1994;6:51–65
  23. Singh D, Young R. Body weight, WHR, breasts and hips: role in judgments of female attractiveness and desirability for relationships. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1995;16:483–507
  24. Tassinary LG, Hansen KA. A critical test of the WHR hypothesis of female physical attractiveness. Psychological Science. 1998;9:150–155
  25. Tovée MJ, Brown JE, Jacobs D. Maternal waist-to-hip ratio does not predict child gender. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 2001;268:1007–1010
  26. Tovée MJ, Cornelissen PL. The mystery of female beauty. Nature. 1999;399:215–216
  27. Tovée MJ, Cornelissen PL. Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile. British Journal of Psychology. 2001;92:391–402
  28. Tovée MJ, Maisey DS, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL. Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 1999;266:211–218
  29. Tovée MJ, Mason SM, Emery JL, McCluskey SE, Cohen-Tovée EM. Supermodels: stick insects or hourglasses?. Lancet. 1997;9089:1474–1475
  30. Tovée MJ, Reinhardt S, Emery JL, Cornelissen PL. Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness. Lancet. 1998;352:548
  31. Wass P, Waldenstrom U, Rossner S, Hellberg D. An android body fat distribution in females impairs the pregnancy rate of in-vitro fertilization–embryo transfer. Human Reproduction. 1997;12:2057–2060
  32. Wetsman A, Marlowe F. How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behavior. 1999;20:219–228
  33. Yu DW, Shepard GH. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder?. Nature. 1998;396:321–322
  34. Zaadstra BM, Seidell JC, Van Noord PA, te Velde ER, Habbema JD, Vrieswijk B, et al. Fat and female fecundity: prospective study of body fat distribution on conception rates. British Medical Journal. 1993;306:484–487

PII: S1090-5138(02)00121-6

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 24, Issue 2 , Pages 88-98 , March 2003

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution