Investigating an imprinting-like phenomenon in humans: Partners and opposite-sex parents have similar hair and eye colour
Introduction
It is a widespread belief that human partners look alike. Positive assortative mating, mating with partners more similar than expected by chance, may result in more stable partnerships (e.g., Hill, Rubin, & Peplau, 1976) and may have genetic benefits (e.g., Rushton, 1988, Thiessen & Gregg, 1980), although costs of inbreeding may limit the amount of self-similarity that should be tolerated (e.g., Bateson, 1980). Research has shown positive assortment (r=.01–.35) for many physical features (reviewed by Spuhler, 1968), and partners' faces resemble each other in ways that allow them to be identified as partners at levels above chance Griffiths & Kunz, 1973, Hinsz, 1989, Zajonc et al., 1987.
If assortative mating for a variety of traits is genuine and is due to active mate choice, how do individuals comes to be attracted to (or avoid) self-similar traits? While it is conceivable that animals recognise kin through similarity to their own phenotype (e.g., Petrie, Krupa, & Burke, 1999), there is considerably more evidence of effects of early exposure to parental characteristics on later mate preferences (e.g., Bateson, 1980, Fujita et al., 1993, Kendrick et al., 1998, Vos, 1995). Positive assortative mating with respect to heritable characteristics should result from such imprinting even if there is no direct response to one's own phenotype.
Negative imprinting has been proposed to play a role in human mate choice. Westermarck (1894) argued that children have an innate tendency to develop a sexual aversion to individuals with whom they live closely in infancy and early childhood (usually siblings and parents). In other animals, however, parental characteristics have generally been found to be attractive in potential mates later in life, not aversive.
The idea of attraction to the opposite-sex parent's form has been a popular one since Freud (1927) and several studies indeed suggest that parental characteristics may influence partner choice. For example, Wilson and Barrett (1987) and Zei, Astolifi, and Jayakar (1981) have both reported small but significant tendencies for the daughters of older men to choose older partners, but of course, this may reflect inheritance of maternal mate choice preferences rather than an influence of paternal appearance. Race is also an observable parental trait, and Jedlicka (1980) found that children of mixed race marriages were more likely to marry someone of the same race as their opposite-sex parent than someone of the same race as their same-sex parent; such choices were consistent across first and second marriages.
Preferences have also been shown to vary in relation to parental traits. Perrett et al. (2002) investigated whether parental age predicted preferences for faces of different ages, and found that both men and women born to old parents were less impressed by youth and more positive to age cues in opposite-sex faces than were individuals with young parents. Thus, visual attraction to parental traits is a plausible explanation for the findings of correlations between parent and partner characteristics.
Hair and eye colour are other parental characteristics that offspring may learn. Significant correlations are found between own and partner's hair and eye colour, indicating assortative mating for these colour traits Pearson, 1907, Pearson & Lee, 1903, Schiller, 1932. Wilson and Barrett (1987) found that women's partners were significantly more likely than chance to have the same eye colour as the women's fathers (and nonsignificantly more likely than chance to have the women's mothers' eye colour); they did not present an overall contingency table but a 2×2 χ2 with parent eye colour (mother and father) and boyfriend eye colour (same or different to parent) produces a nonsignificant result (χ2=4.8, df=3, P=.19). This result, in conjunction with the failure to demonstrate a significantly better match to fathers than to mothers, calls into question the conclusion that the opposite-sex parent was especially influential, and even that parental eye colour was influential at all (especially since parents' eye colours predict own eye colour).
The current study aimed to find out whether own or parental colour traits are positively associated with partner colour traits. We examined own, partner, maternal, and paternal hair and eye colour characteristics in an attempt to establish whether there is assortative mating for hair and eye colour and to determine whether such a mating pattern potentially reflects choice of self-similar and/or parent-similar characteristics.
Section snippets
Participants
Volunteer participants (N=697) were recruited over the Internet. Use of such data is justified by studies showing that traditional and web-based questionnaires produce similar results (e.g., Buchanan & Smith, 1999, Miller et al., 2002), and that similar experimental effects are obtained in laboratory and web-based tests (Buchanan, 2000). Respondents were included if they claimed to be heterosexual, with bi-parental upbringing and have a current partner; 303 identified themselves as women (18–63
Females
For women, own hair colour was significantly positively related to maternal (rs=.35, P<.001) and paternal (rs=.32, P<.001), but not partner (rs=.10, P=.074) hair colour. Paternal hair colour (rs=.13, P=.028) was significantly related to partner hair colour whereas maternal hair colour (rs=.08, P=.17) was not.
Own eye colour was significantly positively related to maternal (rs=.51, P<.001), paternal (rs=.50, P<.001), and partner eye colour (rs=.14, P=.016). Paternal eye colour was significantly
Discussion
The current study demonstrates that, from the first step of the binomial logistic regression controlling for own and same-sex parent eye colour, the single best predictor of both male and female partner eye colour is the opposite-sex parents' eye colour. Opposite-sex parents' hair colour is the single best predictor of males' partners' hair colour although maternal hair colour was also found to have a positive effect on female partner hair colour. These results indicate that individuals choose
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Martin Daly and Margo Wilson for their thoughtful comments and editing and two anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions.
References (27)
Genetic similarity, mate choice, and fecundity in humans
Ethology and Sociobiology
(1988)- et al.
Human assortative mating and genetic equilibrium: an evolutionary perspective
Ethology and Sociobiology
(1980) Optimal outbreeding and the development of sexual preferences in Japanese quail
Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie
(1980)Exposure and affect: overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987
Psychological Review
(1989)Internet research: self-monitoring and judgments of attractiveness
Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers
(2000)- et al.
Using the Internet for psychological research: personality testing on the World Wide Web
British Journal of Psychology
(1999) Some psychological consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes
International Journal of Psychoanalysis
(1927)- et al.
Discrimination of macaques by macaques: the case of the Sulawesi species
Primates
(1993) - et al.
Assortative mating: a study of physiognomic homogamy
Social Biology
(1973) - et al.
Breakups before marriage: the end of 103 affairs
Journal of Social Issues
(1976)
Facial resemblance in engaged and married couples
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
A test of the psychoanalytic theory of mate selection
Journal of Social Psychology
Mothers determine male sexual preferences
Nature
Cited by (117)
Effects of sexual imprinting on partner preference for personality traits in Chinese gay men
2021, Personality and Individual DifferencesFace perception loves a challenge: Less information sparks more attraction
2019, Vision ResearchThe effect of sexual selection on phenotypic diversification among human populations: A simulation study
2019, Journal of Theoretical BiologyConsistency of mate choice in eye and hair colour: Testing possible mechanisms
2019, Evolution and Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Mechanisms that may play a leading role include homogamy and the imprinting-like effect, which are presumed to affect mate choice (reviewed in Štěrbová & Valentová, 2012). Our findings are in line with previous research which found a positive correlation between partner and parent in eye colour (DeBruine et al., 2017; Little et al., 2003; Wilson & Barrett, 1987). Contrary to previous research (Little et al., 2003), however, we found no parental influence on partner's hair colour.
Father's physique influences mate preferences but not the actual choice of male somatotype in heterosexual women and homosexual men
2018, Evolution and Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Further evidence for an imprinting-like effect on mate choice had shown that independent judges rate faces of women's husbands and their fathers as similar (Bereczkei et al., 2002; Bereczkei, Gyuris, & Weisfeld, 2004; but see Marcinkowska & Rantala, 2012; Nojo, Tamura, & Ihara, 2012). In the same vein, women report that their partners have a similar eye color as their fathers do (Little, Penton-Voak, Burt, & Perrett, 2003; Wilson & Barrett, 1987; but see Saxton, 2016). No similarity has been found between the fathers' and partners' hair color (Little et al., 2003; Saxton, 2016), and there is a mixed evidence concerning the effect of mothers' hair color (Saxton, 2016; but see Little et al., 2003).