On genetic variation in menarche and age at first sexual intercourse: A critique of the Belsky–Draper hypothesis

References 

1. Belsky J. Conditional and alternative reproductive strategies: individual differences in susceptibility to rearing experiences. In:  Rodgers JL,  Rowe DC,  Miller WB editor. Genetic influences on human fertility and sexuality: Theoretical and empirical contributions from the biological and behavioral sciences. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing; 2000;p. 127–146
2. Belsky J, Steinberg L, Draper P. Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development. 1991;62:647–670
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
3. Comings, D. E., Muhleman, D., Johnson, J. P., & MacMurray, J. P. (2002). Parent–daughter transmission of the androgen receptor (AR) gene as an explanation of the effect of father absence on age of menarche. Submitted for publication.
4. Doughty D, Rodgers JL. Behavior genetic modeling of menarche in US females. In:  Rodgers JL,  Rowe DC,  Miller WB editor. Genetic influences on human fertility and sexuality: Theoretical and empirical contributions from the biological and behavioral sciences. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing; 2000;p. 169–181
5. Draper P, Harpending H. Father absence and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Anthropological Research. 1982;38:255–273
6. Dunne MP, Martin NG, Statham DJ, Slutske WS, Dinwiddie SH, Bucholz KK, et al. Genetic and environmental contributions to variance in age at first sexual intercourse. Psychological Science. 1997;8:1–6
7. Losoya SH, Callor S, Rowe DC, Goldsmith HH. The origins of familial similarity in parenting: A study of twins and adoptive siblings. Developmental Psychology. 1997;33:1012–1024
   • MEDLINE
   • CrossRef
8. Martin NG, Eaves LJ, Eysenck HJ. Genetical, environmental, and personality factors influencing the age of first sexual intercourse in twins. Journal of Biosocial Science. 1977;9:91–97
   • MEDLINE
9. Mealey L. The sociobiology of sociopathy: An integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1995;18:523–599
10. Rodgers JL, Doughty D. Genetic and environmental influences on fertility expectations and outcomes using NLSY kinship data. In:  Rodgers JL,  Rowe DC,  Miller WB editor. Genetic influences on human fertility and sexuality: Theoretical and empirical contributions from the biological and behavioral sciences. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing; 2000;p. 85–105
11. Rowe DC. Environmental and genetic influences on dimensions of perceived parenting: A twin study. Developmental Psychology. 1981;17:203–208
    • CrossRef
12. Rowe DC. The limits of family influence: Genes, experience, and behavior. New York: Guilford Press; 1994;
13. Rowe DC. Environmental and genetic influences on pubertal development: evolutionary life history traits?. In:  Rodgers JL,  Rowe DC,  Miller WB editor. Genetic influences on human fertility and sexuality: Theoretical and empirical contributions from the biological and behavioral sciences. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing; 2000;p. 147–168
14. Rowe DC. Death hope and sex: steps to an evolutionary ecology of mind and morality by J.S. Chisholm. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2000;21:352–364
15. Rowe DC, Vazsonyi AT, Figueredo AJ. Mating-effort in adolescence: Conditional or alternative strategy. Personality and Individual Differences. 1997;23:105–115
16. Segal N. Heritable and environmental variables affect reproduction-related behaviors, but not ultimate reproductive success. Personality and Individual Differences. 1993;14:783–794
17. Spitz E, Moutier R, Reed T, Busnel MC, Marchaland C, Roubertoux PL, et al. Comparative diagnoses of twin zygosity by SSLP variant analysis, questionnaire, and dermatoglyphic analysis. Behavior Genetics. 1996;26:55–63
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
18. Udry JR, Bearman PS. New methods for new research on adolescent sexual behavior. In:  Jessor R editors. New perspectives on adolescent risk behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998;p. 241–269