Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk

References 

1. Barsky RB, Juster FT, Kimbal MS, Shapiro MD. Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997;112:537–579
2. Bateman I, Munro A, Rhodes B, Starmer C, Sugden R. A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997;112:479–506
3. Boverie PE, Scheuffele DJ, Raymond EL. Multimethodological approach to examining risk-taking. Current Psychology. 1995;13:289–302
4. Chauvin KW, Ash RA. Gender earnings differentials in total pay, base pay, and contingent pay. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 1994;47:634–649
5. Daderman AM. Differences between severely conduct-disordered juvenile males and normal juvenile males: the study of personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences. 1999;26:827–845
6. Daly M, Wilson M. Homicide. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter; 1988;
7. Dervaux A, Bayle FJ, Laqueille X, Bourdel M-C, Le Borgne M-H, Olie J-P, et al. Is substance abuse in schizophrenia related to impulsivity, sensation seeking, or anhedonia?. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2001;158:492–494
8. Epps TW, Singleton KJ. An Omnibus Test for the Two-Sample Problem Using the Emperical Characteristic Function. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation. 1986;26:177–203
9. Flynn J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analysis. 1994;14:1101–1108
10. Freixanet MGI. Personality profile of subjects engaged in high physical risk sports. Human Performance in Extreme Environments. 1999;4:11–17
11. Forsythe R, Horowitz JL, Savin NE, Sefton M. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior. 1994;6:347–369
12. Geary DC. Male, female: the evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1998;
13. Grable J, Lytton RH. Financial risk tolerance revisited: the development of a risk assessment instrument. Financial Services Review. 1999;8:163–181
14. Hattis D, Anderson EL. What should be the implications of uncertainty, variability, and inherent “biases”/“conservatism” for risk management decision-making?. Risk Analysis. 1999;19:95–107
15. Hawkes K. Showing off: tests of another hypothesis about men's foraging goals. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1991;11:29–54
16. Hawkes K. Why hunter-gatherers work: an ancient version of the problem of public goods. Current Anthropology. 1993;34:341–361
    • CrossRef
17. Hawkes KJ, O'Connell F, Blurton Jones NG. Hadza meat sharing. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2001;22:113–142
18. Heiono A, van der Molen H, Wilde GJS. Differences in risk experiences between sensation avoiders and sensation seekers. Personality and Individual Differences. 1996;20:71–79
19. Hill K, Kaplan H. On why male foragers hunt and share food: comment on K. Hawkes. Current Anthropology. 1993;34:701–710
    • CrossRef
20. Jianakoplos NA, Bernasek A. Are women more risk averse?. Economic Inquiry. 1998;36:620–630
    • CrossRef
21. Johnson JE, Powell PL. Decision making, risk and gender: are managers different?. British Journal of Management. 1994;5:123–138
22. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler R. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 1991;5:193–206
23. Kaplan H, Hill K. Hunting ability and reproductive success among male Ache foragers: preliminary results. Current Anthropology. 1985;26:131–133
    • CrossRef
24. Kaplan H, Hill K. Food sharing among Ache foragers: tests of explanatory hypotheses. Current Anthropology. 1985;26:223–239
    • CrossRef
25. Kristiansen CM. The role of values in the relation between gender and health behaviour. Social Behaviour. 1990;5:127–133
26. Levin IP, Snyder MA, Chapman DP. The interaction of experiential and situational factors and gender in a simulated risky decision-making task. Journal of Psychology. 1988;122:173–181
27. Levy, H., Elron, E., & Cohen, A. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking and investment behavior: an experimental analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Finance, The Hebrew University.
28. Lopes LL. Risk perception and the perceived public. In:  Bromley DW,  Segerson K editor. The social response to environmental risk: policy formulations in an age of uncertainty. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992;p. 57–74
29. Low BS. Why sex matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2000;
30. Lurie N, Slater J, McGovern P, Ekstrum J, Quam L, Margolis K. Preventive care for women: does the sex of the physician matter?. New England Journal of Medicine. 1993;329:478–482
31. MacCrimon KR, Wehrung DA. Taking risks: the management of uncertainty. New York: The Free Press; 1986;
32. Powell M, Ansic D. Gender differences in risk behaviour in financial decision-making: an experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology. 1997;18:605–628
33. Rietz, T. A., Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1998). Sensation and risk seeking: an interdisciplinary study. Psychological, simple gamble, and market measures. Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Finance, University of Iowa 〈http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/faculty/trietz/papers/zpaper03.pdf〉.
34. Ripa CPL, Hansen HS, Mortensen EL, Sanders SA, Reinisch JM. A Danish version of the Sensation Seeking Scale and its relation to a broad spectrum of behavioral and psychological characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences. 2001;30:1371–1386
35. Rubin P, Paul CW. An evolutionary model of taste for risk. Economic Inquiry. 1979;17:585–596
    • CrossRef
36. Saha S, Stettin GD, Redberg RF. Gender and willingness to undergo invasive cardiac procedures. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 1999;14:122–125
    • MEDLINE
37. Schroth ML. Scores on sensation seeking as a predictor of sexual activities among homosexuals. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1996;82:657–658
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
38. Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, Kerner JF, Sistrunk S, Gersh BJ, et al. The effects of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization. New England Journal of Medicine. 1999;340:618–626
39. Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk-assessment battlefield. Risk Analysis. 1999;19:689–701
40. Smith EA, Bliege Bird RL. Turtle hunting and tombstone opening: public generosity as costly signaling. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2000;21:245–261
41. Smith VK. Environmental risk perception and valuation: conventional versus prospective reference theory. In:  Bromley DW,  Segerson K editor. The social response to environmental risk: policy formulations in an age of uncertainty. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992;p. 23–56
42. Spigner C, Hawkins W, Lorens W. Gender differences in perception of risk associated with alcohol and drug use among college students. Women and Health. 1993;20:87–97
43. Swanson JM, Dibble SL, Trocki K. A description of the gender differences in risk behaviors in young adults with genital herpes. Public Health Nursing. 1995;12:99–108
44. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1991;106:1039–1061
45. Vesterlund, L. (1997). The effects of risk aversion on job matching: can differences in risk aversion explain the wage gap? Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh.
46. Wang P. Brokers still treat men better than women. Money. 1994;23:108–110
47. Wilson M, Daly M. Competitiveness, risk taking and violence: the young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology. 1985;6:59–73
48. Zuckerman M. Sensation seeking: beyond the optimal level of arousal. New York: Wiley; 1979;
49. Zuckerman M. Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994;