Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 219-228, July 1999

How Universal Are Preferences for Female Waist-to-Hip Ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania

  • Adam Wetsman

      Affiliations

    • UCLA Department of Anthropology, Los Angeles, CA USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests and correspondence to: Adam Wetsman, UCLA Department of Anthropology, 3211 Hershey Hall, Box 951553, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1553, U.S.A.
  • ,
  • Frank Marlowe

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Peabody Museum, Cambridge, MA USA

Received 27 March 1998; received in revised form 24 June 1998

Abstract 

Female waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) has been proposed by evolutionary psychologists to be an important component of human male mate choice, because this trait is thought to provide a reliable cue to a woman's reproductive value. Based largely on work conducted in industrialized societies, the claim has been made that preferences for low WHR are culturally invariant. Presumably, the preferences evolved before the advent of agriculture, making foraging populations the best place to test the hypothesis. This was done with the Hadza of Tanzania, who were shown figures of females that varied by weight and waist-to-hip ratio. Low WHR was not preferred. Hadza men did not consider waist-to-hip ratio when expressing preferences for mates. Instead, they were most interested in the weight of potential partners. Research by others with subjects who practice swidden agriculture also revealed that low WHR was not preferred. The data from the Hadza coupled with the information derived from this horticultural group bring into question whether preferences for low WHR are culturally invariant.

Keywords:  Waist-to-hip ratio, Attractiveness, Mate preferences, Foragers, Hadza

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1090-5138(99)00007-0

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 219-228, July 1999