Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 356-362, September 2009

Implicit associations with social status: the effects of relationship involvement

Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA

Received 24 October 2008; accepted 4 May 2009. published online 22 June 2009.

Abstract 

The study tested the proposition that relationship involvement influences the implicit responses of women to high- and low-status professions. It was hypothesized that when a high-involvement context was primed, women would have more positive implicit associations with high-status occupations than when a low-involvement context was primed. In contrast, when a high-involvement context was primed, women would have more negative associations with low-status occupations than when a low-involvement context was primed. To test the hypothesis, 123 female participants received a high or low relationship involvement prime. Then the participants completed a single category implicit associations test designed to measure the participants' associations with either high- or low-status occupations. As predicted, the relationship involvement prime influenced the positivity of associations made with high- and low-status occupations. The study pointed to the possibility that persons possess evolutionary-based implicit associations.

Keywords: Relationship involvement, Implicit associations, Social status

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1090-5138(09)00042-7

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.05.002

Evolution & Human Behavior
Volume 30, Issue 5 , Pages 356-362, September 2009