Journal Home
Search for

Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 187-192 (May 2010)


View previous. 4 of 10 View next.

Tattoo and piercing as signals of biological quality

Slawomir Koziela, Weronika Kretschmerb, Boguslaw PawlowskiabCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 24 March 2009; accepted 22 September 2009. published online 02 December 2009.

Abstract 

Tattoos and non-conventional piercings are used in many societies. There are several social reasons for which people use these forms of body decorations (e.g., marking social status or signaling membership within a subculture). However, it is interesting why only some people within a group that uses body decoration as a badge of membership decide upon such decorations. Since both tattoos and piercings can present health risks (e.g., due to blood-borne disease transmission risk), we postulate that people who decide to have such a body decoration might have relatively higher biological quality and that tattoos/piercings can be an honest signal of genetic quality. The possible opposite hypothesis is the “attractiveness increase hypothesis,” according to which people use body decorations to increase their own physical attractiveness or to hide some shortcomings in their appearance (e.g., low body symmetry). To test these hypotheses, we compared body fluctuating asymmetry, which is considered a good measure of developmental stability, between individuals wearing tattoos and/or non-conventional piercings (n=116) and a control group (without such body decorations) (n=86). We found that majority of the absolute and relative fluctuating asymmetry indices had significantly lower values in individuals with tattoos/piercings than in the control group. This effect was strongly driven by males. Higher body symmetry of the men having tattoo or piercing indicates that this type of body decoration in the western society can be related to the honest signal of biological quality only for men. We did not find support for the “attractiveness increase hypothesis” for either sex.

a Institute of Anthropology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 50-951 Wroclaw, Poland

b Department of Anthropology, University of Wroclaw, 50-138 Wroclaw, Poland

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Anthropology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland. Tel.: +48 713438674; fax: +48 713752697.

PII: S1090-5138(09)00108-1

doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.09.009


View previous. 4 of 10 View next.